Gpedia:Categories for discussion

Skip to current discussions · Purge this page

WP:CFD

XFD backlog
V	Aug	Sep	Total
CfD	0	7	7
TfD	0	1	1
MfD	0	1	1
FfD	0	5	5
RfD	2	13	15
AfD	0	1	1

Categories for discussion (CfD) is the central venue for discussing specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories and stub types in accordance with the guidelines for categorization, category naming and stub articles.

For detailed instructions about using CfD, see "How to use CfD" below. Briefly, nominations are handled through one of two processes:

Speedy renaming and merging, for uncontroversial proposals that meet specified criteria—see "Speedy renaming and merging" below.
Full discussion, for all other proposals. Discussions typically remain open for at least seven days and are closed once a rough consensus has formed or no objections to the nomination are raised.

Except in uncontroversial cases such as reverting vandalism, do not amend or depopulate a category once it has been nominated at CfD as this hampers other editors' efforts to evaluate a category and participate in the discussion.

When a category is renamed or merged with another category, in limited circumstances it may be helpful to leave an instance of the {{Category redirect|...}} template on the category's former page. See "Redirecting categories" below for more information.

Gpedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a CfD request that is limited in scope to renaming, as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the request closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of a CfD move discussion to determine whether or not the close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines. CfDs involving deletion should be reviewed at Gpedia:Deletion review.

Scope

CfD is intended only for specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories or stub types. For general discussion about how to improve the category system, use other appropriate venues such as Gpedia talk:Categorization, Gpedia talk:WikiProject Categories, and any relevant WikiProjects' talk pages.

Current discussions

Add a new entry

Discussions awaiting closure

Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 19 (1 open)
Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 17 (1 open)
Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 13 (1 open)
Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 11 (1 open)
Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 9 (1 open)
Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 2 (2 open)

See also the list of individual discussions awaiting closure here and the list of full open discussions awaiting closure here.

How to use CfD

Shortcut

WP:CFD#HOWTO

Nomination procedure

Twinkle

You may use Twinkle to facilitate CfD nominations. To install Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and check "Twinkle" in the "Browsing" section. Use the now-installed "XfD" (Start a deletion discussion) tab while viewing the page you want to nominate.

Twinkle only allows you to nominate a single category or stub template. For bundled nominations including multiple categories, or if you prefer not to use Twinkle, follow the manual steps below.

Manual nominations

I

Preliminary steps.

Before nominating a category:

Read and understand the guidance for category names and overcategorization.
For categories containing biographical articles, read the guidance for categorization of people.
For categories containing the user pages of Wikipedians, read the guidance for user categories.

In the following special cases:

If a category is a red link, then it is already deleted (or was never created in the first place) and does not need to be nominated.
If a category is unpopulated, use {{db-catempty}} to request it be speedily deleted in 7 days.
If a category is populated solely by a template (other than a stub template, see #Stub types below) and you are proposing to delete both the category and template, follow the instructions at Gpedia:Templates for discussion.

For further information, see Gpedia:Categorization and Gpedia:Manual of Style.

II

Edit the category.

Add one of the following templates at the beginning of the category page (not the talk page) of every category to be discussed. For nominations involving large numbers of categories, help adding these templates can be requested here.

Otherwise, if nominating a single category:

For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd}}
For merging, use {{subst:Cfm|Other category}}
For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr|Proposed name}}
For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs|Proposed name 1|Proposed name 2}}
For converting the category into a list, use {{subst:Cfl|Proposed name}}
For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd|type=nature of proposed discussion}}

If nominating a group of related categories, use a bundled nomination:

For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd|CfD section name}}
For merging, use {{subst:Cfm|Other category|CfD section name}}
For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs|Proposed name 1|Proposed name 2|CfD section name}}
For converting the category into a list, {{subst:Cfl|Proposed name|CfD section name}}
For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd|type=nature of proposed discussion|CfD section name}}

Include "CfD", "CfM", "CfR", "CfS" or "CfL" in the edit summary, and do not mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
To add the template for previous nomination days, use the "full" version of the template by appending "full" to the template name, i.e. {{cfd full}}, {{cfm full}}, {{cfr full}}, {{cfs full}} and {{cfl full}}. Use the |day=, |month= and |year= parameters to make the banner link to the correct CfD page.
Consider adding {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2022 September 30|CfD section name}} ~~~~ to the talk page of the category's creator.
For details about these templates, see each template's documentation.

III

Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) to copy and paste one of the templates below. When inserting category names into these template's parameters, except the text= parameter, omit the Category: prefix and do not use wikilinks, as the template takes care of this.

If nominating a single category:

For deleting, use {{subst:Cfd2|Obsolete category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
For merging, use {{subst:Cfm2|Origin category|Destination category|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed merge. ~~~~}}
For renaming, use {{subst:Cfr2|Current category|Proposed name|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed rename. ~~~~}}
For splitting, use {{subst:Cfs2|Current category|Proposed category 1|Proposed category 2|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed split. ~~~~}}
For converting the category into a list, use {{subst:Cfc2|Current category|Proposed article|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}
For other options (containerization, etc.), use {{subst:Cfd2|Current category|type=other type|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed conversion. ~~~~}}

For a bundled nomination, use one of the standard templates to build the "Cfd section name" for the first nominated category. After saving that, the second and subsequent nominations must be inserted manually, as follows:

==== Cfd section name ====

* 1st category

* 2nd category [Make clear whether you propose deletion, merging or renaming]

* Your reason for nominating the categories, and signature.

If a bundled nomination is too long, consider using {{hidden}} to hide some of the nominated categories.
In your reason, use links if mentioning articles or categories. To link to a category, use the colon trick by adding a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, e.g. [[:Category:Foo]].
Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Stub types

I

Preliminary steps.

In general, a stub type consists of a stub template and a dedicated stub category. Before nominating a stub type for deletion, merging or renaming:

Read and understand guidance for creating stub types and stub type naming conventions.
Review the list of existing stub types—be advised, this list may not be comprehensive.
If you wish to:
- Create a new stub type—follow the procedure for proposing new stub types.
- Delete, merge or rename a stub category only, without deleting or renaming the associated stub template—follow the instructions above this section.
- Delete or rename a stub template—continue to section II.

II

Edit the template.

Add one of the following tags at the beginning of the template to be discussed.

For deletion, use {{subst:Sfd-t|Section name}}
For renaming, use {{subst:Sfr-t|Proposed name|Section name}}

Please include "SFD" or "SFR" in the edit summary, and don't mark the edit as minor. Preview before saving.
Consider notifying the template's creator on their talk page. To find the contributor, check the page history of the stub template.

III

Create the CFD section.

Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries.

Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) and paste the following text (remember to update the default parameters):

For deletion, use {{subst:sfd-t2|TemplateName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}
For renaming, use {{subst:sfr-t2|TemplateOldName|TemplateNewName|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. ~~~~}}

In your rationale, mention how many articles currently use the template to help other editors. When linking to a category in your rationale, always add a colon (:) to the beginning of the link, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes a category link that can be seen on the page, and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating.
Preview before saving to check that your nomination is formatted correctly, and remember to include your signature at the end of the nomination.

Notifying interested projects and editors

In addition to the steps listed above, you may choose to invite participation by editors who are likely to be informed about a nominated category. All such efforts must comply with Gpedia's guideline against biased canvassing. In addition, to help make your messages about the CfD discussion clear, avoid Gpedia-specific abbreviations, link to relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the discussion itself.

Notifying related WikiProjects

WikiProjects consist of groups of editors who are interested in a particular subject. If a nominated category is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, consider adding a brief, neutral note on their talk page(s) about the nomination. You may use {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2022 September 30|CfD section name}} ~~~~ or write a personalized message.

Tagging the nominated category's talk page with a relevant WikiProject's banner will include the category in that WikiProject's Article Alerts if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a nominated category with {{WikiProject Physics}} will add the discussion to Gpedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.

Notifying substantial contributors to the category

While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and main contributors of the category that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, check the category's page history or talk page. You may use {{Cfd notice}} to inform the category's creator and all other editors.

Notifying other interested editors

It may be helpful to invite other subject-matter experts by posting a message on the talk page of the most closely related article, such as Protein family for Category:Protein families. You may use {{Cfdnotice}} for this.

Closing procedure

Shortcut

WP:CfDClosings

After seven days, someone will close the discussion according to the consensus that formed or, if needed, relist it to allow more discussion. Editors closing discussions must follow the administrator instructions and, except in the case of a "keep" or "no consensus" outcome, implement the result or log it at the Working page to ensure it is implemented.

Redirecting categories

Shortcut

WP:CATRED

In general, an unpopulated category should be deleted (see speedy deletion criterion C1) because it is not useful for navigation and sorting. In limited circumstances, and because categories cannot be redirected using "hard" redirects (i.e. #REDIRECT[[''target'']]), we use a form of "soft redirect" to solve the issue. You can "create" a category redirect by adding {{Category redirect|target}} to the category page. Bots patrol these categories and move articles into the "redirect" targets.

In particular, category redirects are used at the former category name when we convert hyphens into en dashes (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations). It is also helpful to set up category redirects from titles with plain letters (i.e. characters on a standard keyboard) where the category names include diacritics.

A list of redirected categories is available at Category:Gpedia soft redirected categories.

Speedy renaming and merging

Shortcut

WP:CFDS

Speedy renaming or speedy merging of categories may be requested only if they meet a speedy criterion, for example WP:C2D (consistency with main article's name) or WP:C2C (consistency with established category tree names). Please see instructions below.

Determine which speedy criterion applies
Tag category page with {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}
List request along with speedy criteria reason under "Current requests" below on this page

Please note that a speedy request must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points, but only at a full discussion at WP:Categories for discussion.

Request may take 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the speedy criteria for speedy renaming or merging, and to raise objections to the proposed change.

Categories that qualify for speedy deletion (per Gpedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, e.g., "patent nonsense", "recreation") can be tagged with the regular speedy tags, such as {{db|reason}} with no required delay. Empty categories can be deleted if they remain empty 7 days after tagging with {{db-empty}}. Renaming under C2E can also be processed instantly as it is a variation on G7.

To oppose a speedy request you must record your objection within 48 hours of the nomination. Do this by inserting immediately under the nomination:

Oppose, (the reasons for your objection). ~~~~

You will not be able to do this by editing the page WP:Categories for discussion. Instead, you should edit the section WP:Categories for discussion#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here or the page WP:Categories for discussion/Speedy#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here (WP:CFDS). Be aware that in the course of any discussion, the nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience – you may need to search WP:CFDS to find the new location. Participate in any ongoing discussion, but unless you withdraw your opposition, a knowledgeable person may eventually bring forward the nomination and discussion to become a regular CFD discussion. At that stage you may add further comments, but your initial opposition will still be considered. However, if after seven days there has been no support for the request, and no response from the nominator, the request may be dropped from further consideration as a speedy.

Contested speedy requests become stale, and can be untagged and delisted after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and {{moved discussion from|[[WP:CFDS]]|2=~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at WP:Categories for discussion (CfD) in accordance with its instructions.

If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins who process the Speedy page. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a full CFD discussion.

Speedy criteria

Shortcut

WP:C2

The category-specific criteria for speedy renaming, or merging are strictly limited to:

C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes

Shortcut

WP:C2A

Correction of spelling errors and capitalization fixes. Differences between British and American spelling (e.g. Harbours → Harbors) are not considered errors; however if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other then a rename may be appropriate under C2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
Appropriate conversion of hyphens into en dashes or vice versa (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missing conjunction (e.g. Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This includes pluralizing a noun in the name of a set category, but not when disagreement might reasonably be anticipated as to whether the category is a topic or set category.

C2B: Consistency with established Gpedia naming conventions and practices

Shortcut

WP:C2B

Expanding abbreviated country names (e.g. U.S. → United States).
Disambiguation fixes from an unqualified name (e.g. Category:Washington → Category:Washington (state) or Category:Washington, D.C.).

C2C: Consistency with established category tree names

Shortcut

WP:C2C

Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "x by y", "x of y", or "x in y" categorization conventions specified at Gpedia:Category names

This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case then the category in question must be brought forward to a full Cfd nomination.
This criterion will not apply in cases where the category tree observes distinctions in local usage (e.g. Category:Transportation in the United States and Category:Transport in the United Kingdom).

C2D: Consistency with main article's name

Shortcut

WP:C2D

Renaming a topic category to match its eponymous page (e.g. Category:The Beatles and The Beatles).
This applies only if the related page's current name (and by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
- unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
- uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination). C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines at WP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in a no consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
This criterion may also be used to rename a set category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
Before nominating a category to be renamed per WP:C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.

C2E: Author request

Shortcut

WP:C2E

This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.

C2F: One eponymous article

Shortcut

WP:C2F

This criterion applies if the category contains only an eponymous article, list or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable. Nominations should use {{subst:cfm-speedy}} (speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article).

Admin instructions

When handling the listings:

Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.

If the listing meets these criteria, simply have the category renamed or merged – follow the instructions at Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions, in the section "If the decision is to Rename, Merge, or Delete"; to list it for the bots, use the Speedy moves section.

Applying speedy criteria in full discussions

A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:
- The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
- No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.
If both these conditions are satisfied, the closure will be regarded as having been a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.

Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here

If the category and desired change do not match one of the criteria mentioned in C2, do not list it here. Instead, list it in the main CFD section.

If you are in any doubt as to whether it qualifies, do not list it here.

Use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list:

* [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

(The four ~ will sign and datestamp the entry automatically.)
If the current name should be redirected rather than deleted, use:

* REDIRECT [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

To note that human action is required, e.g. updating a template that populates the category, use:

* NO BOTS [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~

Remember to tag the category page with: {{subst:Cfr-speedy|New name}}

A request may be completed if it is more than 48 hours old; that is, if the time stamp shown is earlier than 22:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC). Currently, there are 396 open requests (refresh).

Current requests

Please add new requests at the top of the list, preferably with a link to the parent category (in case of C2C) or relevant article (in case of C2D).

Category:Human activities with impact on the environment to Category:Human impact on the environment - C2D, linking the same main article. --Geysirhead (talk) 16:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Geysirhead: please nominate this for a full discussion, as merging was suggested but did not gain momentum at Gpedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_10#Category:Environmental_issues_with_population. – Fayenatic London 21:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category:United States Museum templates to Category:United States museum navigational boxes – C2C: lowercase the word "museum" and rename according to the type of the templates in the category. —⁠andrybak (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category:18th-century actresses of the Russian Empire to Category:18th-century actresses from the Russian Empire, C2C per Gpedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_18#People_from_the_Russian_Empire. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Albums produced by Wheezy (record producer) to Category:Albums produced by Wheezy – C2D: Wheezy ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category:Governors of Cordoba Department to Category:Governors of Córdoba Department – Per main article Córdoba Department and parent category Category:Córdoba Department. Pichpich (talk) 18:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category:Air Hockey video games to Category:Air hockey video games – C2C: Per parent category, Category:Air hockey. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Category:British Cameroons to Category:British Cameroon, C2D per British Cameroon. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:GW School of Medicine and Health Sciences faculty to Category:GW Medical School faculty – C2D: This provides a more concise name as well as one that can not be confused with any of the other schools with Washington in the name. Wozal (talk) 02:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I'd like to note that I believe WP:C2E is met here. Wozal (talk) 02:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose the new name should be Category:George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences faculty to match the article George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences; C2D trumps C2E (and conciseness). UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There is Category:George Washington University Medical School alumni which should also be renamed, probably per UnitedStatesian's suggestion. Oculi (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @UnitedStatesian and @Oculi

I took a look at (https://smhs.gwu.edu/faculty) and it seems like their logos/branding uses GW. (I'm not sure why the U isn't included here. Their wikipedia page also mentions that their School of Medicine is abbreviated as "GW Medical School".)

Looking at WP:NC-UNI, would the "current branding" (also looking at gwu.edu) where the "GW" is prominent outrank number 4 under the same category? Does Gpedia's WP:CRITERIA also apply to categories:

If so:

What happens when different names are better candidates for certain criteria?

(I'm genuinely curious here)

Wozal (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the question @Wozal: in general category names follow article names, so the usual sequence if there is a better candidate would be to open a requested move discussion for the article; once that concludes the categories can be brought here and speedily moved to match.

As to why it is not GWU, my guess is that it simply does not roll of the tongue: what would that be, gee-triple-you? :) UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Opposed requests

Category:Nicktoons to Category:Television series by Nickelodeon Animation Studio – WP:C2C: Align more with subcat MegaSmike46 (talk) 02:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose, Category:Television series by Nickelodeon Animation Studios should be created as a supercat of Category:Nicktoons, as they also make various other shows, such as various Nick Jr. shows. *:(Oinkers42) (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  That's what I'm trying to address. Almost all of Nicktoons were produced by Nickelodeon Animation Studio (original programming), which includes Nick Jr. I'm actually differentiating "Nicktoons brand" from "Nicktoons TV network" as a separate category for the latter has been made. MegaSmike46 (talk) 19:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  The Nicktoons (TV network) has its own category for original programming (at Category:Nicktoons original programming). They are already distinct. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Not necessarily, I actually retitled that article [previously Nicktoons (American TV channel)] and gave it a separate article [Category:Nicktoons (TV network)]. I wanted Nicktoons to have more distinct, considering it has several international versions.
  
  It is similar to Boomerang (TV network) -> Category:Boomerang (TV network) original programming. Even its sibling, Noggin functions this way. Noggin (brand) -> Category:Noggin (brand) original programming. MegaSmike46 (talk) 17:31, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Fight Club (franchise) to Category:Fight Club – C2D: Per main article, Fight Club. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose; the article Fight Club is only the film, and this category is broader. Not every category has its own article (yet). UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support there is no ambiguity about what Fight Club refers to, and the disambiguation brackets are unnecessary. Jontesta (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose Fight Club is about the film and not the franchise, and thus not the main article of the category. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On hold pending other discussion

None currently

Moved to full discussion

Category:Philippine media company founders to Category:Filipino mass media company founders C2C as above and Category:Filipino businesspeople
- Category:Philippine mass media owners to Category:Filipino mass media owners
- Category:Philippine television company founders to Category:Filipino television company founders
  Specifically concerning the Philippines: If for example Category:Philippine media company founders is about founders of the media companies located in the Philippines it would still be Category:Philippine media company founders; however, if it is about the owners of the media companies who are the citizens of the Philippines it must become indeed Category:Filipino mass media company founders. What is the case here?--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Good point; I don't think the question arises for any other country, e.g. "French company founders" is comfortably ambiguous, since the same adjective would be used for companies or founders. James Lindenberg, Father of Philippine Television, is described as an American-born Filipino, but there's no citation for his being naturalized. Robert Stewart (entrepreneur) is described as American in the Philippines. So technically, these are founders of Philippine companies, including at least one American. However, the whole surrounding hierarchy is "Filipino", and IMHO it would be in order to rename accordingly. If you prefer, I will take this to a full discussion. – Fayenatic London 11:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I think a full discussion would be safer. We probably will end up with some clarifications on the category pages anyway, but I think they are easier to add after a discussion. Ymblanter (talk) 11:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Now at full discussion. – Fayenatic London 13:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Scientists by city in the United Kingdom to Category:British scientists by city – C2C. Rathfelder (talk) 12:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose Not all scientists working in Foo country are Fooian nationals.. This is a "by country" category, not a "by nationality" category. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Laurel Lodged.--Bduke (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The subcats are all of the form 'scientists from London' so they are all British (and subcatted already under Category:British scientists). Oculi (talk) 12:31, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Scientists by city in India to Category:Indian scientists by city – C2C. Rathfelder (talk) 12:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose Not all scientists working in Foo country are Fooian nationals.. This is a "by country" category, not a "by nationality" category. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Laurel Lodged.--Bduke (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You think these two are different from the rest of Category:Scientists by country and city?Rathfelder (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Artists by city or town in India to Category:Indian artists by city or town – C2C: To match the rest of Category:Artists by city or town Rathfelder (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose Not all scientists working in Foo country are Fooian nationals.. This is a "by country" category, not a "by nationality" category. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

All the others in Category:Artists by city or town are of the form Fooish artists from .... Why is this different? I dont think many editors see a distinction between "by country" categories, and "by nationality" categories. Rathfelder (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose per Laurel Lodged.--Bduke (talk) 11:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- These three are now at a full CFD nomination. – Fayenatic London 08:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Cyberwarfare in China to Category:Cyberwarfare by China – C2D. Amigao (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose. Sibling cats use "in", not "by". UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - @UnitedStatesian that's true, but in this case C2D should override C2C because the category content is mainly about attacks on targets outside China. – Fayenatic London 11:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    - Actually I think full discussion should override both C2C and C2D, since there is enough unclear here. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      - Now at full discussion. – Fayenatic London 13:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Saba culture to Category:Culture of Saba (island) – C2D: follow upstream moves Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This should be Category:Saba (island) culture per C2D. Convention in Category:Culture by country is 'Foo[ian] culture'. Oculi (talk) 16:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - See full discussion. – Fayenatic London 12:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Birding and birdwatching to Category:Birdwatching – C2D: Is synonym. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Sorry, this is contentious enough to need a full discussion; the current name was approved at Gpedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 6. – Fayenatic London 23:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Then I'd like to take this to full discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  No objection from me; you'll have to refer to Birdwatching#Birding,_birdwatching,_and_twitching; and be aware of Talk:Birdwatching#Move. If you go ahead, please consider also nominating Category:Birding and ornithology by year & subcats for renaming to "Birdwatching and ornithology". – Fayenatic London 12:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@LaundryPizza03: are you still planning to take this to full discussion? Marcocapelle (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done See today's log. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:41, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Queen's Counsel to Category:King's Counsel – C2D to match King's Counsel. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) SSSB (talk) 07:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@SSSB: The problem is it'll be inaccurate for people who have been appointed QCs who are now deceased. For those who are currently alive, they're now KCs but for those who are deceased, the category will be wrong. That said, we've got people who were appointed as KCs who died before 1952 who are in the QC category, so ideally the category should probably be "King's (or Queen's) Counsel", or... I don't know. Maybe worth going to WP:CFD for an actual discussion... (Also, please ping back, I'm not watching this page.) —Tom Morris (talk) 12:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Tom Morris: I'd argue this distinction doesn't matter, as King's Counsel and Queen's Counsel are synonymous. Alternatively, we can categorise individuals by the title they last held?(I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) SSSB (talk) 13:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I guess this is more suitable for full CfD. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose @SSSB: The main article was boldly moved without an RM just yesterday (and was tagged as a minor change at that) so it's hard to see this falling under WP:C2D. I wouldn't hold up a non-controversial rename given the historical moment except the vast majority of biography articles in this tree were appointed by a queen which is worth discussing. - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:11, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The KCs of the 17th and 18th centuries are currently in Category:Queen's Counsel 1597–1800. I think it makes sense to rename the whole hierarchy to King's Counsel, with redirects from Queen's, but for future reference it might be best to have a full discussion on record. The dated categories should probably also be split/renamed "17th-century King's Counsel" etc, which may not a Speedy matter. – Fayenatic London 10:29, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose the speedy change. I already lodged a nomination to change from Queen's to King's but then withdrew. The reason is that there are many, many QC's who died before the Queen and so retain their title. I don't think we should change their category. Rather, a new King's Counsel category should be created. It is an enormous job but hey, we are addressing the last seventy years of Counsel, and given the likelihood of Charles > William > George ascension, the new King's Counsel is likely to be needed for generations to come. May as well start now, while maintaining the QC's.

I am strongly open to any alternative though. Because I am aware that having two Counsel categories may be redundant and clunky given that really, its the same category but under a different name. MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This needs to be moved to a full discussion. Rathfelder (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think so too. MaxnaCarta (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why not call the category Category:King's and Queen's Counsel? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Metropolitan90: We don't have a King's and Queen's Counsel main article (at this point) but we do have List of King's and Queen's Counsel in New Zealand. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wouldn't it be a good idea to have a King's and Queen's Counsel main article? The point is that being a King's Counsel is the same as being a Queen's Counsel, it just depends on who is the monarch at the time being referenced. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Metropolitan90: The venue for deciding that would be an WP:RM at Talk:King's Counsel, rather than WP:CFD. Win or lose, that would probably be helpful in the category space to ensure the main article has a stable name based on consensus. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:19, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Dancers with a physical disability to Category:Dancers with disabilities
- Oppose the entire above set because "physical disabilities" is a subset of "disabilities". It does not include intellectual disabilities and others. Each of these categories need to be checked and wherever it may be relevant parent or sub-categories created to subdivide the different types 9f disabilities. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:05, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I see no reason why these specific categories should only cover physical disabilities while the rest of the tree covers others. Note also that the Member of Knesset category, a subcategory of Israeli politicians, doesn't just cover physical disabilities. Animal lover |666| 11:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  @Animal lover 666 That might require upmerging subcategories in some cases. This is fine for occupations such as politicians but not for dancers or similar which relate to physical activity where the "variety" of disability is a significant distinction. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  @Roger (Dodger67)The dancer category was not part of my nomination. It was added by someone else afterwards. Animal lover |666| 18:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Should we process politicians and lawyers, and move dancers and musicians to opposed? Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  The only opposer explicitly excluded the politicians (the bulk of the nom) and included the dancers, with no comment about the lawyers and musicians. Processing the politicians would certainly be the right outcome, while the dancers are clearly opposed. Government ministers, clearly being almost if not completely a subset of politicians and part of that category tree, should be assumed to belong with them given the absence of reason to think otherwise. Animal lover |666| 07:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  I have processed all except dancers. – Fayenatic London 21:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  
  This is now at full CFD. – Fayenatic London 11:36, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Empty categories awaiting deletion

The categories listed below have been identified as empty using {{db-catempty}}, and will be speedily deleted after 7 days unless populated. (Note: Due to technical limitations, all contents of the category may not be displayed; view the category directly to see all contents.)

Empty categories awaiting deletion

2018 murders in Sweden

2022 in New Zealand association football

Athletics at the 2023 Pan American Games

Catholics in the German Resistance

Disability organisations based in Jamaica

Emmanuel College alumni

Entertainers from Huddinge

Entertainers from Lund

Entertainers from Norrköping

Iran rail transport color templates

Iran rail transport succession templates

Kenyan expatriate sportspeople in Serbia

National anthem compositions in C minor

People from Konakovo

People from Staritsa

Publishing companies disestablished in 1932

Spain rail transport color templates

Villages in Yahotyn Raion

Villages in Tarashcha Raion

2018 crimes in Sweden

Kenyan expatriates in Serbia

1941 in Laos

Wing Chun pop culture

1911 in Lebanon

Arts in the Comoros

Entertainers by city or town in Canada

Entertainers by city or town in Switzerland

Exodus (Polish band) albums

Saint Kitts and Nevis expatriate sportspeople in the United States Virgin Islands

Spanish commodities traders

Spanish hedge fund managers

Spanish investors

St Josephs Gaelic footballers

Turkey ferry transport templates

Turkey rail transport color templates

Turkey rail transport succession templates

Uzbekistani-language surnames

Wrestling at the 2021 Islamic Solidarity Games

1910s in Lebanon

Saint Kitts and Nevis expatriate sportspeople in insular areas of the United States

Saint Kitts and Nevis expatriates in insular areas of the United States

Macanese singers

Move (Japanese band) albums

2020 World Team Table Tennis Championships

Adam Beyer albums

Brazilian jiu-jitsu in Northern Ireland

Claude VonStroke albums

Craig Richards (DJ) albums

Entertainers by Canadian province or territory

Entertainers by city or town in Australia

Entertainers by city or town in Russia

Ice hockey teams in Åland

Ivan Smagghe albums

Jay Haze albums

Luciano (DJ) albums

Mint 400 Records album covers

Operating system user templates/iOS

Gpedia requested maps in Denver County, Colorado

Entertainers by city or town

Saint Kitts and Nevis expatriates in the United States Virgin Islands

Bella Poarch EPs

Bella Poarch albums

1765 establishments in Rhode Island

Elections in Santa Cruz, Laguna

Independent schools in Warrington

Montreal Canadiennes players

New Zealand people of Mongolian descent

Religious organizations established in 1765

Special schools in Warrington

Tom Denney albums

Emigrants from Australia to the Cape Colony

1765 in Rhode Island

Ice hockey in Åland

Animal penises

Canadian emigrants to the Dominion of Newfoundland

Eyewear brands of Ireland

Models by city or town in Russia

Models by city or town in Thailand

Southern University at New Orleans faculty

Wikipedians interested in the Ateneo Blue Eagles

Gpedia featured topics Towns in Trafford good content

Gpedia featured topics Towns in Trafford featured content

Gpedia featured topics Towns in Trafford

Forfeited dukedoms in the Peerage of the United Kingdom

Forfeited dukedoms in the Peerage of Great Britain

Eyewear companies of Ireland

BMT Fourth Avenue Line templates

Bundeli-language films

Deaths from liver cancer in New South Wales

Deaths from stomach cancer in Norway

Dutch football clubs 1970–71 season

Female models by city

Films directed by Mark Quod

History books about Ethiopia

History books about French Indochina

History books about New Caledonia

History books about the Joseon Dynasty

History books about the Korean Empire

History books about the Spanish East Indies

India formatting and function templates

Sports holding companies based in the United States

Tourism region

1869 in American soccer leagues

1866 college soccer season

1869 in American soccer

1866 in American soccer leagues

1866 in American soccer

1866 in association football by country

1869 in association football by country

Vietnamese Western (genre) films

Aircraft engine manufacturers of Belarus

Bangladeshi companies established in 2016

Çelikhan

Chinese emigrants to South Africa

Entertainers from Belleville, Ontario

Museums in Crane County, Texas

People's Championship

Singers by city or town in Canada

Singers by province or territory in Canada

Trash Haulers of the United States

Ukrainian consultants

Unmanned aerial vehicle manufacturers of Belarus

Waterwheels in Australia

Soviet metal music groups

Sammarinese families

v t e Gpedia community
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Gpedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R Creation Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Gpedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and votings	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup

v t e Gpedia categorization
Guidelines	Categorization Categories, lists, and navigation templates Overcategorization Categorization of people Categorization of portals Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality People by year Categorizing redirects Category names User categories Overcategorization/User categories
Help pages	Categories Category Classification Container category PetScan FAQ for readers FAQ for editors Template index/Category namespace
Discussions	Categories for discussion Categories for discussion/Speedy Categories for discussion/All current discussions
Projectspace essays	Categories are different from articles Categories versus lists Categorising fiction Do not write articles using categories Overcategorization/Intersection of location and occupation Wiki workflow WikiProject Plants/Description in year categories
Userspace essays	DexDor/Terminology categories DexDor/Categorization of award recipients Alan Liefting/On categorisation Coder Dan/Categories gracefool/What is a category? Kbdank71/Wikiproject notification

Gpedia:Categories for discussion

Scope

Current discussions

Discussions awaiting closure

How to use CfD

Nomination procedure

Twinkle

Manual nominations

Stub types

Notifying interested projects and editors

Closing procedure

Redirecting categories

Speedy renaming and merging

Speedy criteria

C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes

C2B: Consistency with established Gpedia naming conventions and practices

C2C: Consistency with established category tree names

C2D: Consistency with main article's name

C2E: Author request

C2F: One eponymous article

Admin instructions

Applying speedy criteria in full discussions

Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here

Current requests

Opposed requests

On hold pending other discussion

Moved to full discussion

Empty categories awaiting deletion

Navigation menu

Search