Wikipedia:Files for discussion

XFD backlog
V Dec Jan Feb Mar Total
CfD 0 0 3 12 15
TfD 0 0 0 0 0
MfD 0 0 0 0 0
FfD 0 0 0 0 0
RfD 0 0 0 42 42
AfD 0 0 0 10 10

Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which may be unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or the nominator specifically requests deletion or removal and no objections are raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.

Examples of what files you may request for discussion, deletion or change here:

  • Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version.
  • Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
  • Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
  • Low quality – The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
  • Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
  • Possibly unfree – The file is tagged with a freeness claim, but may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States or the country of origin.
  • NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements.
  • NFCC applied to free image – The file is used under a claim of fair use, but the file is either too simple, or is an image which has been wrongly labeled given evidence presented on the file description page.
  • Wrong license or status – The file is under one license, but the information on the file description pages suggests that a different license is more appropriate, or a clarification of status is desirable.
  • Wrongly claimed as own – The file is under a self license, but the information on the file description pages suggests otherwise.

If you have questions if something should be deleted, consider asking at Media Copyright Questions.

What not to list here

  1. For concerns not listed below, if a deletion is uncontroversial, do not use this process. Instead tag a file with {{subst:prod}}. However, if the template is removed, please do not reinsert it; list the file for deletion then.
  2. For speedy deletion candidates as well, do not use this page; instead use one of the speedy deletion templates. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
  3. Files that have no source, have an unknown copyright, are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
    1. {{subst:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated.
    2. {{subst:nld}} if a file has a source but no licensing information.
    3. {{subst:orfud}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but isn't used in any articles.
    4. {{subst:rfu}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but could be replaced by a free file.
    5. {{subst:dfu|reason}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed.
    6. {{subst:nrd}} if a file has no non-free use rationale.
  4. Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
    1. {{db-f1|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
    2. {{now commons|File:NEW FILENAME}} if the file now exists on Commons, or {{now commons}} for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
  5. For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file {{db-f9}}.
  6. If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license but lacks verification of this (either by a VRT ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
  7. Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
  8. Description pages with no local file, even though they are in the file namespace, should not be listed here.
    1. Redirects should be treated as in any other namespace: if no speedy deletion criteria apply, they should be listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.
    2. Local description pages with no associated file are speedy-deletable under criterion G8; use {{db-imagepage}}.
    3. Local description pages for files hosted on Commons are usually speedy-deletable under criterion F2 if there is no content relevant to Wikipedia; use {{db-fpcfail}}.
    4. Any other local description pages for files hosted on Commons should be listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
  9. If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 8 for files.
  10. If you are the uploader of the image, tag it with {{db-author}}.

Instructions for listing files for discussion

Use Twinkle. If you can't, follow these steps to do manually:

1
Edit the file page.

Add {{Ffd|log=2023 March 25}} to the file page.

2
Create its FfD subsection.

Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst:Ffd2|File_name.ext|uploader=|reason=}} ~~~~

Leave the subject heading blank.

If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons.

For listing additional files with the same reason, edit the first file section and use {{subst:Ffd2a|File_name.ext|Uploader=}} for each additional file. You may use this tool to quickly generate Ffd2a listings. Also, add {{Ffd|log=2023 March 25}} to the top of the file page of each file other than the first one nominated.

3
Give due notice.

Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:Ffd notice|File_name.ext}}

  • Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media
  • For multiple images by the same user, use {{subst:Ffd notice multi|First_file.ext|Second_file.ext|Third_file.ext}} ~~~~ (can handle up to 26)

If the image is in use, also consider adding {{FFDC|File_name.ext|log=2023 March 25}} to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:

  • Delete. Orphaned with no foreseeable encyclopedic usage.
  • Delete. Replaced by File:FILE2.
  • Free (public domain) file may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States. This photograph was actually first published in 1930, not 1924.
  • Remove from ARTICLE1 and ARTICLE2. The file only meets WP:NFCC#8 with its use in ARTICLE3.
  • Non-free file may actually be free. This logo does not seem to meet the threshold of originality to be eligible for copyright in the United States and should actually be tagged free using {{PD-logo}}.


Some common reasons for deletion or removal from pages are:

  • Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version. Indicate the new file name.
  • Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. (If the file is only available under "fair use", please use {{subst:orfud}} instead). Please consider moving "good" free licensed files to Commons rather than outright deleting them, other projects may find a use for them even if we have none; you can also apply {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}.
  • Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos).
  • Low quality – The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
  • Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
  • Possibly unfree file – The file marked as free may actually be non-free. If the file is determined to be non-free, then it will be subject to the non-free content criteria in order to remain on Wikipedia.
  • Non-free file issues – The non-free file may not meet all requirements outlined in the non-free file use policy, or may not be necessary to retain on Wikipedia or specific articles due to either free alternatives or better non-free alternative(s) existing.
  • File marked as non-free may actually be free – The file is marked non-free, but may actually be free content. (Example: A logo may not eligible for copyright alone because it is not original enough, and thus the logo is considered to be in the public domain.)

These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.

If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.

Instructions for discussion participation

In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:

Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.

Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons''', you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.

Instructions for closing discussions

Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.

Old discussions

The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:


For older nominations, see the archives.

Discussions approaching conclusion

Discussions with at least 6 full days since nomination. After 7 days, they may be closed.

March 18

File:Dresden (album).jpg

File:Dresden (album).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by J04n (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free file may actually be free: This is text and color, does this contain sufficient authorship to be eligible for copyright, or is it pd-text?Justarandomamerican (talk) Have a good day! 00:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Keep current licensing Texture of album might be copyrightable. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Friedrich Beck.jpg

File:Friedrich Beck.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Danko Georgiev (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unable to verify license provided within {{Information}}. Can be re-licensed as fair use since subject is deceased. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stevenmiles.jpg

File:Stevenmiles.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pagadington (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not found at source. Unable to verify license. EXIF of file at flickr link has a copyright holder that is not the uploader. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Iran-stamp-Scott2335.jpg

File:Iran-stamp-Scott2335.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Redtape-on-wiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCCP criteria #8. This is image is not needed to "significantly increase readers' understanding of topic" Iran Air Flight 655. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete I've always thought this file fails NFCC on a number of points, especially #8. Even though it was kept back in 2008 (see this) which I did not agree with, there is no need to show a non-free stamp when the prose could explain why and what the stamp was issued for. There is no critical commentary of any sort about the stamp in the article and even the fact it was issued is not mentioned other than in its short caption. It is not needed to explain the crash and adds nothing except as a decorative element to an otherwsie well illustrated article. ww2censor (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Relicense as PD and move to Commons. PD in Iran per c:commons:Iran#Stamps as it was issued before 1993. Furthermore, PD in the US since Iran is not covered by URAA restoration. Felix QW (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Move to commons: Well Felix QW if you are happy with the 30 years copyright period we can accept move it to the commons; then I'm happy to go with your suggestion. Per This Tineye search there are several higher resolutions images available now, so we should use one of those instead of this one and add it to c:Category:1988 stamps of Iran. ww2censor (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cloud Seeding Process.jpg

File:Cloud Seeding Process.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smcnab386 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per Wikipedia_talk:Ambassadors/Courses/Spring_2011/Regional_Planning_and_Design_(Bruce_Sharky)#William_Mcnab. Permission is needed from original creator as this was taken off a website. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cloud Seeding Process2.jpg

File:Cloud Seeding Process2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smcnab386 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per Wikipedia_talk:Ambassadors/Courses/Spring_2011/Regional_Planning_and_Design_(Bruce_Sharky)#William_Mcnab. Permission is needed from original creator as this was taken off a website. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete, questionable licensing with no usage in the main space. Salavat (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cloudseedingimagerevised.jpg

File:Cloudseedingimagerevised.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smcnab386 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per Wikipedia_talk:Ambassadors/Courses/Spring_2011/Regional_Planning_and_Design_(Bruce_Sharky)#William_Mcnab. Permission is needed from original creator as this was taken off a website. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Recent nominations

March 19

File:Mediterrânic ensemble as lendas do mar.ogg

File:Mediterrânic ensemble as lendas do mar.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble céu imaginário.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble centro nenhum.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble corporal.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble elegia a um tucano morto.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble bando mando.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble yô ê má.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble arabesco.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic ensemble canción por la liberación.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Mediterrânic Ensemble canción mediterranica.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mediterranic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

An entire album (not just sample clips, either, but the complete song files) by a musical group, uploaded for promotional purposes not consistent with Wikipedia's mandate. The problem here isn't copyright per se, as they were uploaded CC by an editor whose username indicates a direct connection to the group -- rather, the problem is that the article about the ensemble was also self-created and is up for has already been deleted by AFD as highly advertorialized and unreferenced, and the files were clearly uploaded in an attempt to misuse Wikipedia as an alternative to Spotify or Bandcamp.
This is not what Wikipedia is for -- even if they did clear WP:NMUSIC (which there's no evidence that they do), Wikipedia is still not a PR platform for musical groups to write about themselves in a promotional manner or to distribute downloads or streaming copies of their own music. Bearcat (talk) 13:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Uptown columbus ga.JPG

File:Uptown columbus ga.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shark96z (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United States. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 20

File:First Office for Digital Webber.jpg

File:First Office for Digital Webber.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ronitnath (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in India. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 21

File:Celebrity Name Game Title Card.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:01, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Celebrity Name Game Title Card.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RandomMacFive (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a duplicate of File:Celebrity Name Game logo.jpeg, I think that file should also be in the Celebrity Name Game (Australian game show) article, and this file should be deleted. From Bassie f (his talk page) 09:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

March 22

File:RichmondRiverRatscap.PNG

File:RichmondRiverRatscap.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tom Danson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems redundant to another fair use file and seems to fail NFCC#3 --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 23

File:Tale Ognenovski with his son Stevan Ognenovski, his daughter in law Margarita Ognenovska, and his grandsons Nikola and Kliment in 2002, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.jpg

File:Tale Ognenovski with his son Stevan Ognenovski, his daughter in law Margarita Ognenovska, and his grandsons Nikola and Kliment in 2002, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 5excellent (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Tale Ognenovski, clarinetist and composer performs live with his son Stevan Ognenovski on drum in Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia on July 9, 2001.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 5excellent (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Tale Ognenovski, clarinetist and composer speak in Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia on July 9, 2001.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 5excellent (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Tale Ognenovski, clarinetist and composer with his Buffet Crampon and Dushko Dimitrovski, ethnomusicologist in 1999.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 5excellent (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Tale Ognenovski, with his son Stevan Ognenovski, Mag. Scient. photographed in front of the Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Zagreb, Croatia in May, 1974.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 5excellent (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Tale Ognenovski, clarinetist and composer with his drum and his son Stevan Ognenovski, in Vodno Mountain, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia in 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 5excellent (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Tale Ognenovski, clarinetist and composer with his Quartet in Vodno Mountain, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia in 2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 5excellent (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Flickr uploader is in the picture and not the photographer, so there's a doubt on whether the photographer licensed this file as {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established and no obvious reason why any of the files would be useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 14:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:India International Exchange.jpg

File:India International Exchange.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DSP2092 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image was originally uploaded as non-free content. The PROD was removed and license altered to Government of India's GODL license. Although the article India International Exchange claims the exchange is owned by the Ministry of Finance in the lead paragraph, the two provided references fail verification. Later in the article, it makes the claim that the exchange is a subsidary of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) which is likely the case. As such, the GODL is not applicable as the entity in question is not part of the Indian government. There is no non-free usage for this as the original use claimed was for identification, but a logo is already present in a separate file, and this image is not a logo. Whpq (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete, questionable licensing with with no real value to the article it is currently used in. Can easily be replaced by a free world map if required. Salavat (talk) 05:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 24

File:Lana Del Rey - Shades of Cool sample.ogg

File:Lana Del Rey - Shades of Cool sample.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per WP:NFCC music samples can only be used where they are explained fully and explained in detail. Criteria #1 and #2 are blank. The sample does not support critical commentary nor is subject to discussion in the article. Its use is superfluous and its omission would not harm user understanding. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 00:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lana Del Rey - Young and Beautiful.ogg

File:Lana Del Rey - Young and Beautiful.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Maine12329 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploaded as a non-0free sample and although there is some mention of the song sample in the article it is not used in a what was satisfies criterion #8, #1, or #2 of WP:NFCC. Its omission would not be contrary to reader understanding and its use in the article does not add to the readers understanding because it is not subject to critical commentary. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 15:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lana Del Rey - Ultraviolence (sample).ogg

File:Lana Del Rey - Ultraviolence (sample).ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The file is used to demonstrate the point "he hit me and it felt like a kiss" but this is already explained adequately in words and so the use of the music sample is redundant per #1 WP:NFCC. There's no explaination of how the sample respects commercial opportunities (WP:NFCC#2). Therefore the omission of the sample would not harm reader understanding as this is already explained in words and the sample itself adds nothing to the point already made. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 15:42, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UEL plaque in Wascana Park 3of3.jpg

File:UEL plaque in Wascana Park 3of3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scotwood72 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works or text in Canada. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ugly Cover.jpg

File:Ugly Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Drdoom71 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused album cover, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March 25

File:Nat-king-cole-longhorn-ballroom BriscoeCenter byRCHickman.jpeg

File:Nat-king-cole-longhorn-ballroom BriscoeCenter byRCHickman.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GusGrl33 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is stated to meet WP:NFCC#8 "because the photo and its historical significance are an object of discussion in the article". However, the photo is not the subject of any sort of commentary. The seating arrangement of Nat King Coles performance is described, but this image is not needed to understand that blacks were seated at the front as the text makes this clear. Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep- I think the image is helpful to understand that blacks were seated at the front. A picture tells a thousand words.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 12:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lothal Port City.jpg

File:Lothal Port City.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DSP2092 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is clearly a photo of a 2-D artwork. There is no information about the photographed art to determine its provenance. Note that this image is not used. Whpq (talk) 02:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Justice-League-Snyder-Cut.jpg

File:Justice-League-Snyder-Cut.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WuTang94 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Rationale does fail WP:NFLISTS, and cannot be used for list articles. Surveyor Mount (talk) 11:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tres Hanley @ NY Fashion Week 2017.jpeg

File:Tres Hanley @ NY Fashion Week 2017.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PleeUK (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Facebook metadata in EXIF. Doubtful own work. See also uploader's talk page. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Footer

Today is March 25 2023. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 March 25 – (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===March 25===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.

The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.