User talk:Adamant1

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments

If anyone wants to discuss something with me then please leave a message on the talk page of the article that it relates to. Otherwise, I will revert you and move the comment there. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Pearl Page for Deletion

Hi, please reconsider the page that I added and please do guide me on what to improve. Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdelima101 (talkcontribs) 16:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Which page are you referring to? --Adamant1 (talk) 00:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Never mind. I see which page it is now. All I can say is to find better references for it if you can. Maybe read through the notability guidelines if you haven't yet. Especially the ones having to do with companies. You can also request the article be drafted as an alternative to deletion in the AfD if your unable to find references at this point and then send it through Articles for Creation later when its in better shape. Personally that's what I'd do. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for guiding me but may I know how I can send it to the Article Article for Creation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdelima101 (talkcontribs) 19:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

No problem. I'm not super up on it but I think Wikipedia:Articles for creation has instructions. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much but the article is still there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Health just that it has a notification that it is for deletion. I visit the Wikipedia:Articles for creation but that was the thing I did when I added the article. Should I re-create it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdelima101 (talkcontribs)

You can request that it be drafted in the AfD as an alternative to deletion and then send it through articles for creation again once you've worked on it more. I don't know what your options are outside of that since I don't create articles. Maybe someone on the Articles for Creation talk page can help you. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much! You deserve the barnstar badge. Hope to have one too someday! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdelima101 (talkcontribs) 22:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Kindness Barnstar Hires.png The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For defending me in my enforced absence at ANI. Really appreciate it. Dronebogus (talk) 08:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I've never gotten a barnstar before :) --Adamant1 (talk) 08:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Holiday greetings (2021)

Adamant1,
I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best from, Interstellarity (talk) 18:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: Thanks. I hope your holiday season goes well also. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Bellerose Composite High School

I undid your PROD nomination on Bellerose Composite High School because it is not uncontroversial. Many high schools fit the criteria for an article on Wikipedia, and I believe this is one of them. Much of this article was wiped (deservedly so) because it was written poorly, but I believe there are sources and material out there that can bring it up to par.

I will try flesh this article out when I have time in the next little while.  DiscantX 19:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

I also undid your PROD at Bert Church High School. I'm less familiar with this one, but it is not a PROD. Take it to AFD if need be and please be more careful with your deletion requests. I see at least one of your other edits was a speedy deletion at Airdrie Koinonia Christian School that was undone by an administrator, so I'm not the only one. There are likely more of your deletion requests that were improperly placed.  DiscantX 20:05, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
@DiscantX: That's fine if you want to improve the articles you removed the PRODs from. I'll give a couple of days to do so and then send them to AfD if they aren't improved to the point of being notable. That said, articles for schools are deleted all the time without controversy. Including high schools. Both through PRODing and the AFD. Just because "many" are notable doesn't mean that all are. The same goes for every topic on Wikipedia and perfectly fine to PROD them. Schools are in not in any way special. In the meantime it's a miss characterizing to say my deletion requests where improperly placed just because you have different standards then the majority of users and think schools get a special pass from PRODs. Next time I'd appreciate it if you just removed the PRODs, left an actual edit summary when doing so, and not leave me messages on my talk page questioning what I do or making things personal in the meantime.
Like I said, I'm fine with you de-PRODing articles you think you can improve. As long as you can do so. If you can't do so then I am fine sending them to AfD and eventually writing an ANI complaint for abusing the de-PROD system if you chronically de-PROD things without a valid reason or improving the articles. Especially if you are unwilling to AGF and try to make it into a personal issue. Which I have zero tolerance for. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I have de-PRODed, to my recollection, two articles in my time editing Wikipedia. It is hardly chronic. As far as edit summaries go, I tried leaving them but it saved the default reversion edit summary instead. I assume it is an issue with some userscript I have installed.
I am not making this into a personal issue, I am trying to engage in a discussion with you to explain my actions in a lengthier manner than a edit summary can do, and because I saw that my edit summaries did not work. You ask me to AGF, I ask you to do the same. Thanks,  DiscantX 07:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
That's good. I wasn't saying it was chronic. As far as the edit summaries goes, I've had similar issues before. So no harm no foul there if that was the reason you didn't leave them. Of course I had no way of knowing that was the reason and people not leaving them intentionally is far more common then them just not being able to because of saving errors. I didn't use to leave them that much myself until someone asked me to. I don't think it's a requirement anyway when de-PRODing articles, but at least a courtesy. I appreciate you explaining your actions on my talk page in absence of the edit summaries though. My main issue was your comment That are likely more of my deletion requests that were improperly placed. Which made the whole thing seem like more a bad faithed fishing expedition. Instead of you just leaving a reason why you removed the PRODs on my talk page. Otherwise, I don't know why you would bring up or question other edits that you weren't involved in. I'm not looking through your edits to find PRODs you might have inappropriately removed in the past to make a broader point about why your de-PRODs in this case were wrong because I could really care less. Like I've said, improve the articles if you think they can be. I'm perfectly fine with that. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Venkat TL

By the way, since we were talking on there, I warned him about his personal attacks on his talk page and needless to say, he doesn't care. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Well, at least you tried. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
<div style="font-size: x-small;">The article is a derivative under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License</a>. A link to the original article can be found <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk%3AAdamant1">here</a> and attribution parties <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Adamant1&amp;action=history">here</a>. By using this site, you agree to the <a href="https://www.gpedia.com/terms-of-use.php">Terms of Use</a>. Gpedia Ⓡ is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd.</div>