Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Unjustified deletion in article Jacques de Sores
Hallo!: source was clearly identified in the comment of addition, as the catholic page: www.evangeliodeldia.org this site has an english language choice; every day, besides Readings for the Holy Mass, the list of saints and blessed the church reminds, along with a short biography of every one of them, appears, just click the icon with a head surrounded by an aureola.
If you look in the web for Jakob Soria, Jacques Sores, and other spellings of Jacques de Sores, or about the case of the Jesuit martyrs in front of island La Palma (the same of the erupting volcano), commemorated in mid July, you could find the many ways the surname is spelled, including 'Souris', 'Soros', 'Soria', also about the Jakob Soria indication he was killing them 'in the name of queen Albret',...
The identity of 'Soria' to 'ShorYah', translation into 'slaughterer for Yah' is immediate in hebrew language dictionnaires, ShorYah= Soria, is self evident, linguistic indicates the rules, the ways, spelling, prononciation of terms changes from time to time, from place to place; you know the surname 'Abadia' comes from 'AbdYah'; that 'Arias' is 'ArYah', the Lion of YahWeh, Judah; usw
This is not 'original research' as it is not research reading a dictionary, it is not research entering a subject in a web search engine, reading what shows. Besides this, you don't specify which of the additions you feel as 'non-referenced'.
- This really doesn't even deserve a reply but whatever. You cannot add content because its "self evident". If you want to make an addition please ensure that it is sourced in the article and not in the summary. Moreover, I am not even sure if that source is reliable, and even if it was, you failed to link to the correct page. Regards, Dark-World25 (talk) 14:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
2021 in football
those data is unuse.
this theme is no mean.
what is 2021 in football
This definition isn't exact
2021 season or 2020-21 season
but 2020-21 include 2020 !!
this theme is no mean
2021 in football definition??
- Please sign your comments with 4 tildas (~). With regards to your comments, if you feel like the issue is that the seasons span over two years, please make a discussion post on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football rather than blanket deleting entire sections.Dark-World25 (talk) 10:18, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Yes,I think the issue is that the seasons span over two years
Hi, you recently deleted a change i had made on the CEDU page in regards to the experiences of one of the camp goers as you said I did not provide a source yet I was continuing from the source that was provided in the same bullet point a sentence earlier. The sourced sentence has three sentences after detailing the person's experiences but you deleted my sentence of his experience which was from the same source.
I wasn't aware I had tagged any articles with PROD for at least the last six months. If you're referring to CSD tags, only one had been declined for legitimate reasons while another was tagged while the article had a total of three words, which was reworked later. Even assuming that all were rejected, 9 tags over 11 days is hardly "far too many". Best regards, Dark-World25 (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Milan edit warring
hello! Thanks God someone who can give a helping hand here! Well, yes i am having a problem on the Milan page, a user is constantly changing what is written on the page, and i have asked him several times not to do this unless he has verified information with sources, but it is really useless because he continues without stopping! What bothered me the most was the part he changed about the city's history, in which he removed what was already written (and verified with the citations) and wrote other things totally nothing to do with the city's history! If you can do something I would appreciate it very much, there were already other users here who were also reversing what he wrote on the page, but I think that's just me now. Jerkusla (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Looked like a stub to me. Don't care enough to fight you over it. Dark-World25 (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)