User talk:Subtropical-man

Jump to navigation Jump to search

San Diego in-person Wikimania 2021 mixer

Saturday 14 August 2021: San Diego in-person Wikimania 2021 mixer
Wikimania logo with text 2.svg

You are invited to the San Diego in-person Wikimania 2021 mixer on Saturday 14 August, from 8:00 pm to 9:00 pm at American Legion Albert J. Hickman, Post 460, in Kearny Mesa, San Diego. Join Wikimedians from San Diego, and from throughout Southern California, at one of a few in-person events happening throughout the world to commemorate the virtual Wikimania 2021.

Visit our event page for more information at your convenience.

We hope to see you there! --RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for San Diego-area events by removing your name from the mailing list.)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Scale of justice 2.svgHello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

AfD you previously voted in

I thought you might want to know its in AfD again.

Its back up again. You made some amazing arguments the first time around. Super (talk) 21:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

If you look at the other delete votes they are also sock puppets. He has it least two. I am not using name because I am talking to a receptive admin r n. So we might get that topic ban. Super (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
@Supercopone: Yes, apart from break WP:BATTLEGROUND and abuses AfD templates and pages, I also noticed that this is a whole group of users who not only vote in the same way, use the same arguments but also defend each other. I used to notice (few years ago) that their actions by this group users are similar to Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Meatpuppetry. Therefore, I have left this topic aside. I do not intend to vote in the AfD on these porn cases anymore, it's just wasted time and nerves. If you want to fight to solve the problem (topic ban for this users for abuse AFD) or another idea: restriction option for everyone for example: each user can only create 10 new AfD reports per year and 40 votes on AfD pages per year, then you can send me a link to the discussion. Meanwhile, I'm out. Subtropical-man ( | en-2) 15:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

I started a ani on this.[1] This is some messed up stuff.Super (talk) 19:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Also, so sorry for dragging you into this. I just find the systematic purging of notable articles by a few users working together egregious.Super (talk) 22:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

You should know better than to claim someone has a phobia

I'm positive you know about AGF. Doug Weller talk 10:38, 6 December 2021 (UTC)


Hi - I've just closed the ANI thread. I did not see consensus for any sanctions to be applied to you, but it was a close-run thing: please take this as an indication that many of your colleagues saw your behaviour towards Spartaz as sub-par, and try to act upon that indication. While I am not empowered to implement an interaction ban on you, I would strongly advise you to act as though one were in place: Wikipedia is a very big place, it should be possible for you to simply avoid them. Best Girth Summit (blether) 22:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Regards. Subtropical-man ( | en-2) 22:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Edits on potential superpowers page

Hello My Friend,

I have seen you have been constantly undoing my edits mentioning China as Emerging/Deputy Superpower, however that's the reality assessed by many strategic analysts whether you like it or not. Also the edits mentioning were also done before by many users. You can see think tank assessments, as well as commentary by political analysts. It seems you are citizen of a country with anti-China sentiments & may be following biased news channels, but I recommend you to do self study before making any changes. No personal feelings. Have a great day !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

@ Must to be credible academic sources consistent with the consensus in the article. Also, your changes have marks original research/synthesis (breaks Wikipedia:No original research). Secondly, take into account that there are sources for other countries as well for term of "Emerging Superpower", therefore, favoring only China is breaking Wikipedia's rules (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). Thirdly: the article is called "Potencial superpowers", you are trying to separate China from the rest by calling it as "Emerging Superpower" without any consensus. Fourthly, your comment of "It seems you are citizen of a country with anti-China sentiments" breaks another rule of Wikipedia: Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Subtropical-man ( | en-2) 15:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
<div style="font-size: x-small;">The article is a derivative under the <a href="">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License</a>. A link to the original article can be found <a href="">here</a> and attribution parties <a href=";action=history">here</a>. By using this site, you agree to the <a href="">Terms of Use</a>. Gpedia Ⓡ is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd.</div>