Gpedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Brandon (pornographic actor) (2nd nomination)

Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Michael Brandon (pornographic actor)

Michael Brandon (pornographic actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Most of the sources are adult industry publicity, and the few that aren't give trivial coverage 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete Non-notable actor. TH1980 (talk) 01:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep. The subject has been a prolific entertainer since the 1980s. The SF Weekly covered Brandon's career and falling back into illicit substance use here, where they called him "a beloved San Franciscan gay porn icon". They then covered Brandon vowing to make a comeback afterward (here). He was the executive director of the Community Initiative in San Francisco (here). The Dallas Voice did a profile on him here. They covered a career pivot here. A resort named a suite after him, which was the first time a resort had done that for a gay porn performer (here). --Kbabej (talk) 09:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment Which sources are you referring to? There is a lot of references in the last AfD. Christian75 (talk) 15:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Christian75, I was confused about that as well. There are multiple RS currently in the article, and I’ve pointed out more above. Currently used are: SF Weekly, Dallas Voice, and San Francisco Bay Times. Also AVN, which is a green-level RS at WP:RSP. —Kbabej (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per Kbabej. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 21:51, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article is a derivative under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. A link to the original article can be found here and attribution parties here. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use. Gpedia Ⓡ is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd.