Gpedia:Articles for deletion/Naina Singh

Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Naina Singh

Naina Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This article doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. I tried to search on Google, and couldn't find any independent "significant coverage". The best helping thing in this article is that the subject has been a winner at MTV Splitsvilla in 2017. This doesn't help the actress pass WP:ANYBIO in my opinion. WP:NMODEL isn't met because there is nothing substantial role except in the Kumkum Bhagya and I do not see any borderline pass for WP:BASIC. Comments please. ─ The Aafī (talk) 09:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment This is a classic case of how liberal you want to be with WP:BASIC. She is listed in the main cast at Kumkum Bhagya so there is some notability at WP:NACTOR but even NACTOR requires multiple roles. So we can't use that to establish notability. I vaguely remember that winners of reality TV shows were considered notable but I am not able to find that essay now. Fairly possible that my memory is incorrect - hence refraining to use that as an argument. GNG is not met for sure. We are left with WP:BASIC and come back to how conservative we want to be. If we are on conservative side, we will see all sources as regular PR announcements driven by PR agencies. If we are liberal, we will take note of multiple WP:RS writing at least one to two paragraphs about the subject. So all depends on where we are on the spectrum! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep as passes WP:NACTOR with a prominent role in Kumkum Bhagya and winning Splitsville which I would consider as a reality television role and its certainly a prominent role in a notable production. There are plenty of reliable sources in the article already to confirm a pass of WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG so there is no valid reason for deletion in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 03:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete It doesn't pass GNG as most of the coverage appears to be PR. I don't think it satisfies WP:NACTOR as well which requires multiple significant roles. It lacks here. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep - appears to be plenty of press on her, from established Indian Media (The Times of India, etc). Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
<div style="font-size: x-small;">The article is a derivative under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License</a>. A link to the original article can be found <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FNaina_Singh">here</a> and attribution parties <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Naina_Singh&amp;action=history">here</a>. By using this site, you agree to the <a href="https://www.gpedia.com/terms-of-use.php">Terms of Use</a>. Gpedia Ⓡ is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd.</div>