Gpedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sweden

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Sweden. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Gpedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Sweden|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Sweden.
Further information
For further information see Gpedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch
HILLBLU lente.png
Scan for Sweden related AfDs


Sweden

Jews for Israeli–Palestinian Peace

Jews for Israeli–Palestinian Peace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non-notable organization. Couldn't really find anything in English sources. Perhaps there might be some Swedish coverage. Mooonswimmer 13:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Katz, Olle (29 August 2015). "Debattinlägg: "Riksdagsledamöter stöttar israeliska högerextremister"". SVT Nyheter (in Swedish).
  2. ^ "Svenska judar oeniga om vägen till fred i Israel". Svenska Dagbladet (in Swedish). 9 January 2003.
  3. ^ "DEBATT: Skilj på legitim Israelkritik och judehat" (in Swedish). Göteborgs-Posten. 11 October 2021.
  4. ^ "DEBATT: Palestiniernas folkrätt glöms bort i debatten". www.expressen.se (in Swedish). 3 Dec 2021.
  5. ^ "DN Debatt. "Oriktiga uppgifter om SodaStream"" (in Swedish). Dagens Nyheter. 19 July 2013.
  6. ^ "Judiskt stöd till Mana". Arbetaren (in Swedish). 29 January 2008.
  7. ^ "Judisk kritik mot Ebba Busch Thor". Dagen (in Swedish). 25 August 2016.
  8. ^ Helgesson, Fredrik (22 February 2017). "De vill lösa Israel-Palestinakonflikten utan våld". Sveriges Radio (in Swedish).
  9. ^ Landy, David (2011). Jewish Identity and Palestinian Rights : Diaspora Jewish Opposition to Israel. London: Zed Books. p. 113. ISBN 9781848139299.
  10. ^ "Israeli ambassador vandalises art exhibit". The Irish Times. 17 January 2004.
  11. ^ "Israeli Says Artwork Is 'Call to Kill'". Los Angeles Times. 18 January 2004.
  12. ^ Doneson, Daniel A (Autumn 2004). "Snow White, the Ambassador, and the Aesthetics of Death : Azure - Ideas for the Jewish Nation". azure.org.il.
  13. ^ "Sharon Praises Ambassador's Art Attack". DW.COM. Deutsche Welle. 18 January 2004.
Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 14:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Tobias Alpsten

Tobias Alpsten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Contested WP:A7 speedy deletion. Clearly fails WP:GNG with zero reliable sources. Part of a recent spree by WP:SPA accounts promoting the Alpsten family; see Alpsten family, Ellen Alpsten and Caspar Alpsten. No claim to meeting WP:ANYBIO. To be honest, I'm not sure what the actual claim to notability is here. Gpedia doesn't need an article on every single person who founds a company, LinkedIn is a better and more appropriate platform for promotion than Gpedia.

During my WP:BEFORE search I found trivial coverage only; see Chronicle Live and Digital LA. Such coverage does not count towards GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Alpsten family

Alpsten family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Created by an WP:SPA solely dedicated to creating articles on this family, which seems to have no WP:RS coverage. Even the basic claim that they originate from Småland doesn't seem to be covered anywhere. The only member of the family who is potentially notable is Ellen Alpsten. Gpedia is not a web host for vanity projects like this so the article should be deleted. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Caspar Alpsten

Caspar Alpsten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

I was unable to find any significant coverage in my sources to confirm WP:GNG notability. Also doesn't seem to meet WP:NMUSICIAN, WP:CREATIVE or WP:ANYBIO. Every single source cited is self-published and I couldn't locate any WP:RS on Alpsten. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Keep - All but two sources of the Caspar Alpsten page aren't actively controlled by the user so all sources qualify as reliable and independent, the subject is notable and the article upholds Gpedia standards. The user Ingratis seems to not have done his research.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Blankslate123 (talkcontribs) 21.03, 9 January 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE, see SPI Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep - As the creator of this page, I'd like refute any points made in question to notability or reliability of the majority of sources cited. I must agree however that some points are poorly cited with one or two sources being self published, this is because I first saw them in print. I wasn't quite sure to leave those out totally or simply leave those minor details unverified. If the consensus is so, I'd like to take the opportunity to remove and replace any information that isn't 100% verifiable. I'm also quite new to the Gpedia community, I've made an effort to look into the guidelines before editing the article and in my view the subject fit all the relevant criteria to be on Gpedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raindropcroptop (talkcontribs) 21.26, 9 January 2022 (UTC) (now blocked)
Where is this significant coverage then? Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete I also searched but found no reliable sources about this person or his work. Possibly TOOSOON. HouseOfChange (talk) 21:39, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete - lacks SIGCOV from reliable third party sources.-KH-1 (talk) 02:21, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete - faily GNG, no proof of notability, lack of 3rd party coverage. Dennis Brown - 11:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete: All of the potential sources appear to be self-published. ―Susmuffin Talk 01:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 TT me 15:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete - Does not meet notability standards due to a lack of sigcov. Appears also to be a WP:CONFLICT. Gpedia is not a genealogy. Family histories should be presented only where appropriate to support the reader's understanding of a notable topic and this article is not aiding this purpose. Such-change47 (talk) 02:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Jan Gyllenbok

Jan Gyllenbok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Kadıköylü (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Anastasia Michaelsdotter

Anastasia Michaelsdotter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

I'm not sure if this person passes WP:GNG, so I thought I'd bring it to discussion.

I can't find many reliable sources that mention her (Anastasia Michaelsdotter or Stasia Michael) that aren't just interviews or quotes from her, and all of the sources in the article seem like passing mentions or non-independent. The lead also mentions she was featured in a documentary, but if the majority of sources are anything to go by, it could just mean she was mentioned in it.

The original version of the article has 2 sources that may be reliable and/or significant, but they are written around the same time (early 2015), so I'm not sure if that indicates lasting notability (or if it's enough).[1][2]

Her article has also been deleted on the Swedish Gpedia 4 times for "relevance" (not sure if that's similar to English Gpedia's notability standard), and this English article was created a month after the first deletion. - Whisperjanes (talk) 16:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Marie Forså

Marie Forså (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Absence of RS. Fails GNG & ENT and is woeful for a BLP Spartaz Humbug! 10:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. This is related to the Swedish sin. Book hits include [3], [4] and [5], though the hits are not very in-depth, Forså's name is brought up as a selected mention. Another article related to a book is behind a paywall, but the Google preview gives the quote Alltmedan svenska nakenmodeller som Christina Lindberg, Marie Forså och Marie Ekorre gör internationella karriärer, i.e. international careers. What about contemporary sources? Geschichte (talk) 21:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep. As pointed out above, several writers keep coming back to Forså as a central figure in Swedish pornography of the era. Not just a journalist and writer like Kalle Lind (linked above), but Swedish scholar of pornography Mariah Larsson keeps including Forså multiple times. I've added a few references, expanded the article somewhat, and ordered one of the books mentioned above from a local university library (though this AfD dicsussion will be over by the time I've read it). /Julle (talk) 13:56, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 01:59, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete non-notable actress. Oaktree b (talk) 16:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep - per improvements made by Julle. Per book hits. Per overall sourcing. Falls within WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 18:06, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete - Insufficient sourcing. I went through ten pages of Google results and only found links to clips - no media coverage. Linked films in filmography are only bit parts, and she's not even mentioned in their infoboxes. Flagged since 2010 for needing more sources (hatnotes were more recently backdated to 2006 and 2008). Fails WP:GNG, unless someone can provide more info demonstrating that the content in the books listed as sources is significant. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 00:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 00:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete per Timtempleton. What this comes down to for me is that the only references we have on her that might be usable are from the two books that are referenced in the article, but it's pretty likely going by the titles of the books that they are not in-depth coverage. If we are extremely lucky one might be, but that's not enough for notability on it's own. I'm not convinced by keep voters who cite "book hits" as a reason to keep either. Since it's akin to "keep because of the number of Google Search results" or something like that. Which isn't valid. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete, per above. Really not notable that much, and what Timtempleton is stating, not reliable sourcing, no online websites to prove it. Severestorm28 01:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


Others

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates

See also

<div style="font-size: x-small;">The article is a derivative under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License</a>. A link to the original article can be found <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Deletion_sorting%2FSweden">here</a> and attribution parties <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Sweden&amp;action=history">here</a>. By using this site, you agree to the <a href="https://www.gpedia.com/terms-of-use.php">Terms of Use</a>. Gpedia Ⓡ is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd.</div>