Gpedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Television. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Gpedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Television|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Television.
Further information
For further information see Gpedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch
HILLBLU lente.png
Scan for TV related AfDs

This will only scan about 1,500 categories. Go here to tweak which ones are scanned.

Related deletion sorting


Television

Where's Everybody

Where's Everybody (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

No references, unnotable. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 10:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Murray Golden

Murray Golden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Golden directed episodes in a lot of televsions shows, often less than 6 in shows that ran well over 20 episodes. The sourcing is low quality such as IMDb and a search for additional sources turned up nothing substantial. Just having a job directing television episodes does not make someone notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Andy Le

Andy Le (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Early stage character bit-part actor. References are mostly promotional PR, profiles and interviews that are primary. scope_creepTalk 18:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Sonpreet Jawanda

Sonpreet Jawanda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non notable actor. No major roles as an Actor. Not enough news coverage for qualifying notability. Article created by a blocked user. IndaneLove (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Rizi Timane

Rizi Timane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Refs are either primary, SPS, shops or non-RS. Fails WP:BIO, WP:ANYBIO. scope_creepTalk 15:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Vivek Kar

Vivek Kar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Failing the notability criteria. Multiple issues already mentioned on page. PangolinPedia (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. PangolinPedia (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. PangolinPedia (talk) 13:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Greg Dulcie

Greg Dulcie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Exclusively-voice actors don't get much publicity as a rule. Dulcie is not the exception, so WP:GNG is not satisfied. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd

Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Repeatedly recreated by multiple editors over the last few months. Time to decide whether it is notable and can have an article (at a better title), or not notable and then new versions can be G4 deleted and title variations salted. See Draft:Goldmines Picture, Goldmines Telefilms Pvt. Ltd, Draft:Goldmines Telefilms Pvt. Ltd., and Goldmines Telefilms (perhaps others as well?). Fram (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

I think the topic is notable and have backing of sources. I provided quite a few at the article.Success think (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete: Nothing to show independent notability, fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP. Sources need to have significant coverage on the company, not on specific productions. There is an existing draft that should be worked on until accepted by a reviewer. Ravensfire (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

The subject is notable, and I'm working on its development, give sometim. I also provided refs to verification. Dharma Productions have article than why not this production ? Have petients.Success think (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

@Success think, that's why there is a draft article, where it CAN be worked on and developed with patience. When it's in main article space, it needs to be in decent shape. Sources need to be about the COMPANY primary, not about a particular production. Ravensfire (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

@Ravensfire: I did some work, are you satisfied the sub is notable. As far I know 2 or 3 refs is also enough on WP and I also saw many articles are present her without a single source. This sub is notable. Success think (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC) I add more data in Goldmines article & provided 12 refs. I think it is notable now and no need to delete it. So close this discussion.Success think (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete Another promotional effort from undisclosed paid editors. The subject fails NCORP. This article relies heavily on one citation (used many times) that is an interview. Much of the rest is routine or churnalism. I checked one source that doesn't support assertions in the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete Company does not have any real significance or any real news reports. It is just known as a dubbing company but that is about it. I would suggest it gets moved to the draft space or just entirely deleted it does not even have any purpose to be present. SP013 (talk) 06:35, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

@SP013: Sir, I wrote this article & I'm not a paid editor. I got into this sub just 'cause of Pushpa : The Rise, I added more data into it and if you fellow editors think it's not worth to have page on WP, tell me without wasting time, I put some work on it. I'll not add anything now into it. If you it's not follow WP: NOTABLE than your free, But Economic Times have all the information about this firm, ET is notable newspaper of India and you can also add.Success think (talk) 07:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Charlie Tjoe

Charlie Tjoe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Both references provided in the general references page are unreliable, and overall the subject appears to just be an actor who doesn't have much coverage at all I could find. Also, the name in the article title is misspelled. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Isaac Hasson

Isaac Hasson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This article is not notable, and lacks any references. It mostly attibutes to IMDB. Severestorm28 01:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Atsuki Mashiko

Atsuki Mashiko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER notability guidelines. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Llamas with Hats

Llamas with Hats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

I didn't want to do this since this is among my favorite animated video series, but Llamas with Hats sadly just falls drastically short of notabillity guidelines. An IP erroneously dePRODded the article with the explanation that sources could be found on the talk page; these sources do not and have never existed on said talk page. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 03:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

I Heart Arlo

I Heart Arlo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This series was not reviewed by a single major critic. It fails WP:GNG and the guidelines set at MOS:TV. I redirected the article to Arlo the Alligator Boy but that action was reverted by an editor advising deletion. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Primary NFL television stations

Primary NFL television stations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This is not an article: it's a series of lists too extensive/crufty for the encyclopedia (such lists as former TV networks for NFL teams pre-1960, NFL games that were aired on local stations), etc. I corrected a typo and added an inline reference; astonishingly, it is the only one on the page.

It is true that one television station in a given NFL home city airs more than half the games of the home city team in any given year, but with more primetime games and cross-flexing, this is not very important. More importantly, these arrangements are functions of a network affiliation, not of individual station deals. This is, to use my words from another AfD, a source-bare piece of mush that has no place on the encyclopedia. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 04:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Support unconditionally. The fact that only one citation exists says a lot. Moreover, what is a "primary NFL television station" when the television contracts are made at the league level? Nathan Obral • he/him • tc • 05:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete If anything, the article should be refocused solely on stations which are a team's official pre-season and other programming partner rather than...a list of stations which carry NFL games, which outside CW/MyNet stations, all Big Four network affiliates do these days. And that's already in each team's article, so this is just so much over-detail already covered by each network's individual NFL coverage article. Nate (chatter) 06:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete I have to agree, it doesn't look like this article content is what we're looking for in a Gpedia article or list. It's not really covered well as a topic in third party articles. I don't disagree that it's a useful reference for enthusiastic viewers of NFL games, but that sorta feels more like original research. Topic might be better suited for an online sports almanac or TV directory. I suggest enthusiastic editors try another wiki.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:23, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie and Mrschimpf: Quite frankly, this is an article since it goes a bit into the history of how the National Football League has been televised. Keep in mind that this article isn't at all remotely about prime time games that air on NBC's Sunday Night Football. You can't just subjectively say that what station in what market primarily airs a specific teams games isn't important. It's very apples and oranges to compare prime time programming, where the game is all but guaranteed to get screened to the entire nation to what will likely be aired on only two markets. Also how isn't this an article? How is a list of Primary NFL stations any different than a local over-the-air markets that say, air Major League Baseball games (e.g. KTLA 5, for many years, aired Los Angeles Dodgers games) for example. That's roughly the equivalent to that. You're basically appear to saying that there's no need to tell people about how NFL games are distributed. Simply put, not every single game is going to be made available (unless of course, you have the Sunday Ticket package) to the general public. It's also very, very presumptuous to flat out say that an article like this isn't needed at all since it's simply in each team's own article already. BornonJune8 (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
@BornonJune8 The fundamental difference between the NFL and the other leagues is that the NFL controls all the regular-season television inventory. If you air an NFL regular-season game, that's because your network has a contract with the league to show NFL games. If you air an MLB, NBA, or NHL regular-season game (outside of the national rights packages associated with each league), it's because you have a contract with the team. An almanac, 506 Forums, etc. would be a good place for the lists which have some value to someone, but not here. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie: Again, you come across quite subjective when you say that an almanac, 506 Forums, etc. would be a good place for the list which has some value to someone, but not here. So says the person who initially nominated said lists for deletion to begin with. Bare in mind that there's extensive information about what is in the Primary NFL television stations article virtually all of the induvial articles for the local stations. And why it may be true that unlike with other pro sports leagues, the NFL controls all the regular season TV inventory, what exactly does that have to do with which exact station (i.e. the "home market") principally airs one particular franchise's games? I must reiterate that a local viewer usually week in and week not, is only allowed (unless otherwise) to see the teams from their home market. Yeah, the NFL may control the TV inventory but they're still divvied up region to region. BornonJune8 (talk) 07:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
There's a lot of things that are of value to people that don't belong on Gpedia. There is a policy that outlines Gpedia:What Gpedia is not, and I believe specifically 2.6 Gpedia is not a directory applies here. I must admit I'm not sure what it means to "come across quite subjective" but that seems to be a personal attack, albiet a lighter one. However, a weak personal attack is still wrong. Please limit your comments to the matter at hand rather than the person making them.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete per nominator and Paulmcdonald's well reasoned rationale. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete references about this are extremely lacking and it's not very clear what a "primary NFL television station" is. Maybe the article could be refocused solely on stations which are a team's official pre-season and other programming partner per Mrschimpf, but I feel like whoever wants to undertake that endeavor should do so by creating a new article. As I don't think the current one could be adapted to a new direction well enough to justify keeping it and just changing what it's about. More so because there's a good chance that whatever comes out of the new direction likely wouldn't be notable or workable either. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Traci Hovel

Traci Hovel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Was unilaterally redirected to What Would You Do? (2008 TV program) by the article creator Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs), but given the long list of (mostly minor) roles, the redirect target is probably inappropriate, and deletion may be required if she fails WP:NACTOR and cannot be redirected to What Would You Do?LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Darwin's Yearbook

Darwin's Yearbook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

I made this article two years ago with little understanding of WP:GNG and MOS:TV. Now, I can see that it is not notable. It was not reviewed by critics and is essentially a clip show. I suggest deletion or redirecting to List of The Amazing World of Gumball episodes. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Game Prattana

Game Prattana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

The available sources there is YouTube. Reading BeansTalk to the Beans 20:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Isa Baghirov

Isa Baghirov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Notability? Looks like a promotional article on a non-notable topic. Wikisaurus (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

List of Grizzly Tales for Gruesome Kids episodes

List of Grizzly Tales for Gruesome Kids episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Unreliable (and dubious) sources with contradicting information in some and lacking evidence in others. It's been hard finding better but it's turned out impossible. —MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Ali Zein (Journalist)

Ali Zein (Journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This journalist does not meet criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:JOURNALIST. It seems like there is a lot of sourcing in the article, but it's all paid PR advertising, with several bylines to "Two Media"; or that clearly states it's an "AD" - native advertising. In a BEFORE search, I found a lot on an athlete named Ali Zein, but that's the wrong person. I don't read Arabic, so I'm bringing it here for feedback from the community, hoping that any fluent editors will weigh in. If decent sources can be found, the nom can be withdrawn. Netherzone (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete The tone of this article seems to be promotional, it also does not meet the criteria WP:GNG.--Tysska (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete, non notable person. Searching for his digital marketing agency Keemya shows little results apart from some organic products which are unrelated. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete this is vanity spam bordering on a hoax and great exaggerated at best. SANTADICAE🎅 19:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Jatin Sial

Jatin Sial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Has been deleted before twice, once only a year and a half ago, and all five references appear to be interviews. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Seong Gi-hun

Seong Gi-hun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Kang Sae-byeok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Cho Sang-woo (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

We already have List of Squid Game characters, which had its own AFD which closed as no consensus, with the primary argument that for a show with only one season, such a list is generally overkill. But assuming that the list is going to stay, now creating articles on individual characters from a single season is overkill, particularly as most of the content outside of the "character biography" is the same on the list page, and itself the same on the Squid Game page. We're effectively triplicating the plot summary which is not appropriate. Add that the notability of these characters is very very weak (one or two sources providing that, ignoring the recaps that are primary sources). If we're going to have the list, these individual article should not exist. Masem (t) 06:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Masem (t) 06:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Masem (t) 06:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Redirect all per nom. What little nontrivial information there is can be added to the list of characters. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment Most of the content in Cho Sang-woo is copied from Fandom. Most of the content in Kang Sae-byeok is copied from List of Squid Game characters and HoYeon Jung. Some content in Seong Gi-hun is copied from List of Squid Game characters and a bit from Fandom, which I removed.— Diannaa (talk) 14:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Redirect all to List of Squid Game characters. Notability of the list article aside, there's no need for WP:SPINOUT articles at this time. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Redirect all. The list isn't even notable. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 15:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment It would be a good idea that there exist different articles made for the individual characters from Squid Game, as an article containing information about the different characters could generally be filled with helpful information about the character in the series, which maybe wasn't on the List of Squid Game characters. In relation to the List of Squid Game characters, much of the information given on the article made for Seong Gi-hun (first created on the 9th of October, 2021), was created 2 months before the information on the character written on the List of Squid Game characters (first created on the 9th of December, 2021). In other words, much of the information from the list were directly taken from the article created for Seong Gi-hun, and were written before the creation of the character's own article. Therefore, it would be puzzling, unnecessary and unfair to delete the article made for the character from the show (Seong Gi-hun), as it was made long before the information about the character of Seong Gi-hun was written, and long before the article named List of Squid Game characters was created. This is of course only when talking about the article Seong Gi-hun, but with the two other articles of the two characters, Kang Sae-byeok and Cho Sang-woo, it is a bit understandable, as some of the information taken from the article List of Squid Game characters is also on the articles on both of the characters, though most likely not stolen from it. However, I do not believe that these two articles (Kang Sae-byeok and Cho Sang-woo) should get deleted, as the information on the two characters' own articles is different from the list, and I don't think that the different characters from the show don't deserve their own personal articles just because there exists an article of a list over the different characters with information about them. Not only this, but concidering that the creator of Squid Game, Hwang Dong-hyuk, announced and confirmed that there will be a 2nd season of the series, it doesn't hurt that there exist articles on the characters from the series before the premiere of the 2nd season. I published the article for Seong Gi-hun 2 months before the list over the characters were made, which only consisted of information taken from different websites, where I also put my sources with details. That is the story of that article before more edits were done by other editors. You can view the history tab of both the article Seong Gi-hun and the article List of Squid Game characters, and you can view the dates of the different edits. — UDoh2Nation (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2022 (CET)
Netflix has made clear they are only on negotiations for a second series, it is not confirmed. Additionally two of these characters cannot appear unless they do flashbacks or prequels. --Masem (t) 17:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
It is true, in terms of announcing and confirming the 2nd season, that Netflix hasn't confirmed it, but the creator of the show, Hwang Dong-hyuk, has stated in an public interview with Associated Press that there will be a second season of Squid Game, but that the release date and the way it will be made is uncertain. That is where I got the information from, but it of course doesn't confirm it from Netflix's own side. Does that mean that if two of the characters discussed (Kang Sae-byeok and Cho Sang-woo) do not appear in either a flashback or a prequel, they can't have their own article? If that is the case, then that means that the article for Seong Gi-hun can still be up, in relation to if the character will appear again? — UDoh2Nation (talk) 19:36, 18 January 2022 (CET)
Netflix responded immediately after that AP report that no second season was confirmed. --Masem (t) 18:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I see. Apologies for not reading further into the case. What does this exactly mean to the article, Seong Gi-hun? You stated that the content outside of the "character biography" is the same on the list page, when a big chunk of the content under Seong Gi-hun's section in the List of Squid Game characters was directly taken from the individual article. Because of the reason you stated, it is very inappropriate to take down the article, which contains a major part of the content that was put into another article afterwards. I know you also referred to the other two characters from the series, but considering that the content, which both articles share, was written on the individual article of Seong Gi-hun first, it really isn't fair if you consider to delete the article because of this. The poor sources that were given to the page I fully understand, and that is something that can be edited and fixed. — UDoh2Nation (talk) 09:11, 21 January 2022 (CET)
Worth noting that Season 2 has now been confirmed by Netflix, and it's already known Lee Jung-jae will return as Gi-hun. So I think Gi-hun's article should stay (since he is the show's protagonist and most important character), whereas Sae-byeok and Sang-woo can be redirected to the list article. --InPursuitOfAMorePerfectUnion (talk) 18:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
While it is truth that Netflix has affirmed this, there's still a lack of anything now that can't already be covered on the character list page. If there's more about his character after S2 airs (which is likely at least a year out), then we can recreate it from a redirect. --Masem (t) 19:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Sreejith Guruvayur

Sreejith Guruvayur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

A makeup artist with no evidence of notability and fails WP:GNG. Also the article does not have a single reliable source. Onmyway22 talk 16:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Kalen Chase

Kalen Chase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

He appears not to be notable outside of a band that never really made it off the ground and is notable only for certain people involved in it aside from Chase. I previously PRODded this, but it has been refunded. No attempt to improve the article has been made. dannymusiceditor oops 18:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Madhumita G Das

Madhumita G Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Insufficient reliable sources to show that this person meets WP:NACTOR. I moved the article to Draft:Madhumita G Das, but author recreated the article again without working on the Draft. I indicated the problem in a PROD, but the PROD was removed without explaination. Singularity42 (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

The Company (production company)

The Company (production company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Completely unsourced since 2013; does not meet WP:NCOMPANY, WP:GNG. I can find no coverage of this company. Admittedly, searching for "The Company" is rather difficult, considering the generic name. The only indication that I can find that this company even exists is from their Facebook page. – Pbrks (t • c) 18:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Apur Sangsar (TV series)

Apur Sangsar (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non-notable show. Most of the sources are unreliable. Shinnosuke15, 13:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Heather Rene Smith

Heather Rene Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Biography for a non-notable playmate model. damiens.rf 02:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

TV Hana

TV Hana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

NO evidence of notability and no reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG Onmyway22 talk 17:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Alison Fanelli

Alison Fanelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Tagged for notability since August and I do believe this fails WP:NACTOR (has not had significant roles in multiple notable projects or made prolific/innovative contributions to entertainment). Notable for only one role as a child actress. In most sources I could find Fanelli is only mentioned in passing (like where is the cast of Pete & Pete today?). Sro23 (talk) 00:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Alessio Scalzotto

Alessio Scalzotto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non-notable actor who has only starred in one notable production, thus failing WP:NACTOR, and has only received secondary coverage in unreliable publications, thus failing WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Greetings.
I deeply apologize for the creation of the page. I created the page in a rush and I noticed that the page had many mistakes. I promise to do better and to take the time needed to create a page, using the right information. The actor is indeed non-noticeable and I apologize. I assure you that I will try my best not to make the same mistake again. I hereby confirm that the page should be deleted. I really hope I did this right. MrMikipideah (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
@MrMikipideah: don't worry about it, the notability guidelines can be quite byzantine and there's no shame in making an honest mistake. Experienced editors do that all the time. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 16:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Salma de Nora

Salma de Nora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails GNG & ENT. Might have passed PORNBiO but now awards no longer count this no longer meets inclusion standards. Spartaz Humbug! 15:59, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Amber Lily

Amber Lily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Advertorialized WP:BLP of an singer, not properly referenced as passing our inclusion criteria for singers. The notability claims here are that she was a non-winning competitor in a singing competition and otherwise just that her work exists, rather than any concrete evidence that she achived anything that would pass WP:NMUSIC -- and while the article also claims that she's an actress, it offers no indication whatsoever that she's ever done anything of note as an actress at all. And for sourcing, two of the six footnotes are to her own self-published website about herself and three more are of the "music metaverifying its own existence on Amazon.com" variety, which are not reliable or notability-building sources. And while there is one footnote to a real piece of media coverage here, it's a very short blurb nowhere near substantive enough to carry her over WP:GNG all by itself if it's the only acceptable source in the mix.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced considerably better than this. Bearcat (talk) 22:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Gpedia:Articles for deletion/Disney International HD (2nd nomination)

Shaji Chaudhary

Shaji Chaudhary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non notable actor. No major roles as an Actor. Not enough news coverage for qualifying notability. Article created by a blocked user. IndaneLove (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Artyom Mikhalkov

Artyom Mikhalkov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Russian actor of episodic roles and director of little-known films.--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

DWRP-TV

DWRP-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Television channel does not meet WP:GNG- lacks coverage in independent sources to distinguish it from a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL channel. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

  • It does seem to originate local programming, but when it comes to the Philippines, I have no idea where to find appropriate sources. If this article is to be kept, someone with more familiarity with Filipino TV will have to find me information on its history or more coverage, because right now, with no other context, I would !vote delete. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 23:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Radyo Pilipino, which is the owner of the station, and it is mentioned there. Not enough in-depth sourcing to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 16:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting to generate consensus on redirect target or if article should be deleted outright.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Life Is Ruff

Life Is Ruff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Couldn't find any good sources. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 11:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Yoriko Angeline

Yoriko Angeline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

non-notable actress. fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR Behind the moors (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Comment nothing more than paid coverage. Published in same paper, by the same author, date 1 june, 2 june. We can't consider this independent, multiple, in-depth coverage. Behind the moors (talk) 20:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete per Behind the moors well argued reasons as to why the coverage we have meets essentially none of the prongs of GNG, let alone all the prongs.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

List of Zig & Sharko episodes

List of Zig & Sharko episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. ––FormalDude talk 05:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 05:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep Spinoff articles for listing the episodes of a notable show, are quite common and acceptable on Gpedia. Dream Focus 06:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep This was unilaterally split from the main article due to its length, and lists of episodes are usually encyclopedic. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:16, 11 January 2022 (CST)
  • Delete I'm finding it extremely hard to see how this doesn't fail the notability guidelines for lists. Maybe WP:OTHERLISTSLIKEITEXIST or whatever, but in this case none of the episodes are blue linked or referenced to reliable sources and there's zero evidence that any of them ever will be. Nor is there evidence that reliable in-depth sources discuss them as a group or set. Otherwise, someone should provide some references to prove it, and not just reviews of the seasons or the show in general. Otherwise we could justify creating lists of episodes for every random small town public access show out there. Which, as far as I'm aware, we can't justify or do. Even in cases where the show might otherwise be notable. At least for something like Mister Rogers' Neighborhood the episode lists are per season and they include small summaries of each episode. Maybe something like that would work here, but having an indiscriminate list of 160 episodes without any context, plot summaries, references, blue links, or anything else that would actually serve an encyclopedic purpose just goes against WP:NOTDIRECTORY and Gpedia not being a database of indiscriminate facts. More so because the Zig & Sharko is questionably notable and it's article is horribly referenced. At least create a list notable episodes in Zig & Sharko that can add to it's notability and then at some point re-create it when there's a justification to. Otherwise people are really putting the cart before the horse here. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 07:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Keep, but remove the unsourced episode plots and American premiere dates (article doesn't even mention said American network it was on, so this could be the date some expatriate kid got a DVD from HMV or something). Common for a series like this to have a list-of separately to keep the main article light. Nate (chatter) 09:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Based on what part of the notability guidelines for list articles? --Adamant1 (talk) 03:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Selective Merge back to Zig & Sharko, where this was split from (diff). The Zig & Sharko article is presently at 12kb, so the list would still fit (WP:SIZERULE), particularly if it is pruned as per the suggestion of Mrschimpf above. That said, some sources verifying the content would be helpful; the list article presently has no sources (perm link). North America1000 06:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep - As per WP:SIZERULE at 50 episodes a season, and that's even without detailed descriptions of each ep, it clearly needs to be split off its own page. Division should take place at 60 kB, and this article alone is 89k Deathlibrarian (talk) 09:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Nidhish Kutty

Nidhish Kutty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Worked in only 3 movies, not significant coverages. PQR01 (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Namashi Chakraborty

Namashi Chakraborty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Does not meet WP:NACTOR as the person is yet to debut. Also lacks significant coverage to meet GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Allan Maraynes

Allan Maraynes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Appears to be an autobiography; no significant coverage from any reliable sources; sources are mostly just mentions or stories written by the subject. Awards listed appear to be mostly (if not all) awards for teams, and many aren't particularly notable. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 02:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Twoja twarz brzmi znajomo (season 15)

Twoja twarz brzmi znajomo (season 15) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Unsourced TV series article. Non-notable. scope_creepTalk 14:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Comment - I don't speak Polish so can't speak to the quality of the sources, but just wanted to flag that the main page for this show links to season-specific pages for most of the series, so if the consensus is that this page isn't notable, presumably all the similar ones could also be deleted or merged into the main page. --CameronVictoria (talk) 15:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment I appreciate one shouldn't be parochial, but I can't see any point in having an article with the Polish name as its title. Presumably anyone who can understand the article's title can also read the Polish WP's article on the subject, and anyone who cannot, will have no idea what the article is about anyway, which renders it utterly pointless to our English-speaking readers. Given that the natural language of English WP is English, it should at least be moved to an English-titled article (e.g. Your face sounds familiar (Season 15) (Polish TV show)), unless it is commonly known in the English-speaking sphere by its Polish name; and if moving it renders it meaningless, it probably isn't notable. Elemimele (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep Each of the previous seasons has its own article, and most of them have only a single reference. So there is no rationale for deleting this one that doesn't apply to all the others. Whether they SHOULD have independent articles, and whether it is appropriate to have a Polish title for them, can be discussed elsewhere, probably at the parent article. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
It should apply all the others. It not acceptable for articles not to have references. The standard to pass Afd is WP:THREE. This article doesn't meet that. It does have one reference. Every part of it should be referenced. It is more than a question of fairness. A lot of these folks don't seem to want to put references in. They would rather copy the content from the source, like as happened here and leave as is. That is unacceptable in 2022. Saying they have a single reference doesn't escape the problem. The article was redirected twice, by different editor's and this editor, who has talk page full red warnings, edit warred to bring it and doesn't communicate. I'll get the rest of them in. scope_creepTalk 11:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Merge to an article about all seasons. Gpedia should not be a TV guide magazine. - GizzyCatBella🍁 08:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. RL0919 (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Crystal Kung Minkoff

Crystal Kung Minkoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Reality show performer. Not enough in-depth coverage outside of the show to show they have any notability outside the production. Should probably be a redirect, but was reverted. Onel5969 TT me 18:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 18:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Redirect - to Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. When I read things like this: According to Bravo, Crystal and Rob live in Bel Air and Crystal has formal culinary training, and she has a passion for cooking and throwing extravagant parties. She is an enjoys skier and loves to play tennis. in the encyclopedia it is often signal that there is either promotional editing going on or there is not enough info out there to substantiate notability for a stand alone article. This too: Kung is a 76th-generation descendant of is filler. Fails WP:NACTOR Netherzone (talk) 20:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Perhaps you can assess secondary coverage and not the quality of the current text, which can be changed? ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
      @Another Believer hello! just seeing your note now. When I did a BEFORE search, all I came up with was social media, something called "Facebook Wedding Style", and primary sources like interviews without editorial content. I also found low-quality sources similar to what is in the article. I found things that looked like native advertising - that appears to be an article but with the byline "produced by digital editors" or no byline, which makes me think it's PR placement, and not real reporting or journalism. Please improve the article if you can find independent secondary SIGCOV in reliable sources. Netherzone (talk) 14:40, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 03:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 03:20, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Redirect as suggested by Netherzone , for the reasons given there. There's no encyclopedic information. I'm not sure it's promotional , but its not a basis for an encyclopedia article DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Other XfDs

Proposed deletions

<div style="font-size: x-small;">The article is a derivative under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License</a>. A link to the original article can be found <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Deletion_sorting%2FTelevision">here</a> and attribution parties <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Television&amp;action=history">here</a>. By using this site, you agree to the <a href="https://www.gpedia.com/terms-of-use.php">Terms of Use</a>. Gpedia Ⓡ is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd.</div>