Gpedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Women

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Women. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Gpedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Women|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Women.
Further information
For further information see Gpedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to People.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch


Women

Chau Nguyen

Chau Nguyen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails the WP:GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 23:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Simona Galik (Tennis Professional)

Simona Galik (Tennis Professional) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Tennis player whose best ranking as a pro was 505th (209th in doubles). She had a good college career in a small school (Flagler College) but college tennis only gets limited coverage and as a result, there's just not enough significant coverage in third-party sources to warrant an article. Pichpich (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Danica Moadi

Danica Moadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This article lacks the required sources for WP:GNG. IBG news and Nettv4u do not appear reliable, The Times of India is a questionable source per WP:RSPS, and BollySpice is a primary source. A WP:BEFORE only found social media and the like. I don't think the actress meets WP:NACTOR because she is only in small roles in the cited films. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 01:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @CollectiveSolidarity, thanks for your efforts for Gpedia. To be clear, The Times of India is a questionable source when it comes to Indian Government related topics. Danica Moadi has done big roles in the cited films and a renowned face in Indian television & film industry. I request you to please do not consider this article for deletion. Jishan.JAM (talk) 09:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello there @Jishan.JAM. The Times of India, per WP:RSPS is considered "...to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. It [also] tends to have a bias in favor of the Indian government." Aside from that, the Times article appears to contain merely promotional material, as it says that Moadi is a foodie, and acts in the notable show Navya. However, she appears to not have a major role in the show, seeing that she is located near the bottom of the cast list, and WP:NACTOR requires that the actor have a significant role. The same can be said for the other shows she acts in, where she is also located near the bottom of the list. Aside from that, the sources of the article appear to be unreliable, or are primary sources.
To establish notability and warrant an article, a subject must have at least two reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, per the WP:GNG. I could not find any reliable sources that were independent of the subject using Google Search/Books/etc. But if you can find any reliable sources online, please feel free to insert them into the article and save it from deletion. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Marion Bailey

Marion Bailey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Once again, in the process of trying to verify biographical details, specifically her Watford origin, I was unable to locate any significant coverage about her. She has trivial mentions in reviews about her work (typically no more than one or two sentences), and in articles about her partner Mike Leigh. Again, I checked all the usual Google suspects, as well as WMF Library Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, and Newspapers.com and found nothing but trivial mentions or routine casting announcements. ♠PMC(talk) 09:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and England. ♠PMC(talk) 09:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:15, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep. Well-known actress with appearances in notable films, shows and theatre productions. Played a major role in a very notable series (The Crown). Clearly notable. Sometimes common sense has to prevail. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:26, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep. As stated above by Necrothesp, the subject has appeared in many notable films as well as performed in a major role in the series The Crown. Also, the subject was given a Screen Actors Guild award and was nominated for Supporting Actress of the Year by the London Film Critics' Circle Award, all of which are included in the subject's article. Meets WP:GNG and passes WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 00:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vanisha Kumar

Vanisha Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep I've added additional sources to ensure that this article passes WP:GNG. As for WP:SIGCOV I found multiple articles about her in about 2 minutes on google, but if you misspell her name you get nothing. Good old google I guess. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 05:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per sources added which show notability. GiantSnowman 09:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep there are clearly sources which provide significant coverage and pass GNG. It would be helpful if the nominator would actually check before going straight to AfD.--IdiotSavant (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - Per above. Besides the sources already on the page I have found these additional sources which shoe she is notable in Fiji: 10 and 11 among many many other sources not listed here which shoe she is notable in Fiji. She is probably only foreign based Fiji women's player and clearly significant figure in Fiji football. All the other Sports WikiProjects don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 10, but why should any Sports WikiProject have 10 deleted per day? By the time I finish writing this, another ten will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Asilika Gasau

Asilika Gasau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cema Nasau

Cema Nasau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Keep - have added sources, which were easily found. In addition to the routine stuff to demonstrate facts, there's substantial coverage in two Fiji Times articles. Again, it would be nice if the nominator looked before nominating. It would also be nice if they tagged relevant wikiprojects - in this case, WikiProject:Fiji - rather than excluding them.--IdiotSavant (talk) 10:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - Per above. Besides the sources already on the page I have found these additional sources which shoe she is notable in Fiji: 15, 16, and 17 among many many other sources not listed here from Fiji Sun, Fiji Village, FBC News, Fiji Live, and Fiji Times etc which show she is notable in Fiji. She is clearly significant figure in Fiji football. All the other Sports WikiProjects don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 10, but why should any Sports WikiProject have 10 deleted per day? By the time I finish writing this, another ten will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maria Lewavuni

Maria Lewavuni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Raijieli Lewasoqevula

Raijieli Lewasoqevula (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Silina Qarawaqa

Silina Qarawaqa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Laniana Qereqeretabua

Laniana Qereqeretabua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stella Naivalulevu

Stella Naivalulevu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Patricia Nyirenda

Patricia Nyirenda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Talia Mar

Talia Mar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Lacks reliable sources under WP:MUSICBIO despite fulfilling WP:MUSICBIO#C2. There is limited coverage of the charting single itself and she is only a featured artist (edit: apologies, that is incorrect, she is fully credited). Significantly, the majority of sources are self-published or primary. Besides the chart listings, almost no other sources fulfill reliability guidelines, even after being cleaned up. Simply fails to have the necessary independent reliable sources anywhere else besides little more than a paragraph about Stay the Night. RedBaron12 (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Women, and Entertainment. RedBaron12 (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete per my previous nom and the first nom. Having a single charted song or even album doesn't make one notable, it's just a CCS. If the song is notable (as in covered by multiple independent RS and not just a chart placement), we can have an article about that but that doesn't make Mar notable themselves. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Strong Keep the song has coverage and evidence that it charted in not one but two national charts so therefore passes WP:MUSICBIO#C2 which is enough to pass as notable and able to have a page on the site as there are other artist pages which have charted in one national chart, with less sources and less content on the page, yet they still stand so the evidence given and notability of the song makes it notable. It is both her and Sigala's song she isn't a feature, this has evidence. If the sources were "unreliable" that would of been made a point more in the 2nd nomination and would of been deleted then. RedactedUser300 (talk) 17:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment - The previous AfD for this singer was closed just last week as Keep and there were no delete votes after the nomination. However, that AfD was closed by a non-admin, which accomplished little beyond unleashing yet another AfD upon us. Something has gone wrong here with our WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NAC processes. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, per rational provided by Praxidicae and nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ruma Sharma

Ruma Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG PravinGanechari (talk) 11:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Orthea Riley

Orthea Riley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tamisha Williams

Tamisha Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep pass GNG and SIGCOV. See: Badminton Pan Am, The Barbados Olympic Association, Barbados Today, Caribbea n Life, Daily Nation. Stvbastian (talk) 11:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep pass GNG and SIGCOV. Gold at Carebaco Internationaland Suriname International, participant in 2022 Commonwealth Games, 2019 Pan American Games. Florentyna (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Luksimi Sivaneswaralingam

Luksimi Sivaneswaralingam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kong Hye-ok

Kong Hye-ok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOLYMPICS and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Daniela Ramírez (footballer)

Daniela Ramírez (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lice Waqailiti

Lice Waqailiti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Titilia Waqabaca

Titilia Waqabaca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sekola Waqanidrola

Sekola Waqanidrola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per sources below which show notability. GiantSnowman 07:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - @GiantSnowman: I found sources like [1], [2], and [3] among many many other sources that show she is notable in Fiji. In addition, she is a young capped international player with an ongoing career. All the other Sports WikiProjects don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 10, but why should any Sports WikiProject have 10 deleted per day? By the time I finish writing this, another ten will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep as per sources above. I've added some into the article.--IdiotSavant (talk) 11:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ashanee Thompson

Ashanee Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:12, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Christi-Anne Mills

Christi-Anne Mills (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heather Gladney

Heather Gladney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Subject does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Wikilinks appear to link to the wrong works, no independent sources at all, almost no media coverage, even the personal website is a dead link. Chagropango (talk) 11:06, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete. Probably. Although I would say her website being down should not be a factor. One of the links was indeed pointing to a song by the same name as the play/book, and then redirected to the album that the song was in, but that starting link was wrong, I disconnected it. She seems to have written two books that are mentioned a lot briefly in other books and all over fan pages, but I could not find anything notable. If she did in deed write the plays she is linked to, that would probably make her notable, but I've not been able to find evidence that she did. This feels harsh as events in the 1980s probably tend to be noted offline and the role of women in them is often downplayed. I've love to see the evidence and be persuaded she is notable. Until then, she seems not notable. CT55555 (talk) 03:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. CT55555 (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC) I posted it to WP:ARS in the hope that someone can find the sources.Reply[reply]
  • Keep per WP:AUTHOR #3. Article has been greatly expanded from nomination. There are 6 reviews, and a notable author Charles Gramlich who says Gladney has been influential for him. -- GreenC 19:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Meets WP:NAUTHOR thanks to sources added since nomination. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Sources have been found that the author meets the subject specific guideline for authors. Dream Focus 01:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anee Icha

Anee Icha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This actress and "personality" does not meet notability criteria for WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG nor WP:BASIC. The article sourcing is of poor quality: unreliable (BellaNaija),;a photo caption that mentions her name; non-indepth coverage, or doesn't mention her at all. A WP:BEFORE search reveals social media; no SIGCOV. It's possible that in a few years she may be notable per WP standards, but at this time it's WP:TOOSOON. Bringing it here for the community to weigh in on. Netherzone (talk) 23:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Nigeria. Netherzone (talk) 23:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment There are SO many articles similar to this created by the same user recently. ~StyyxTalk? 23:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I'm going to take it to ANI, they've had more than enough chances to abide by our notability and BLP policies. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Content citing Bella Naija have been removed. There are still about 9 other references from punch, nation and vanguard ( all newspapers).the article is notable because Anne Icha has starred in many films and one of the popular one is Namaste Wahala, a bolly and Nollywood movie.

Aside that She is one of the female celebrities that held meeting at Lagos on ways to solve problem affect women in the movie industry which is the june edition of the Inkblot Women in Film (IWIF) lunch. (All well sourced).Tesleemah (talk) 07:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tesleemah, all four sources are simply name-checks with no editorial content. Simple mentions of her name are considered trivial, and do not count as Significant Coverage. This is how our guidelines describe significant coverage: "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. The book-length history of IBM by Robert Sobel is plainly non-trivial coverage of IBM. Martin Walker's statement, in a newspaper article about Bill Clinton,[2] that "In high school, he was part of a jazz band called Three Blind Mice" is plainly a trivial mention of that band. Do you see how that is very different than the sources in the article? Simply being in a film does not make a person automatically notable, it is what actors/actresses do - it's run of the mill. We need substantial, in-depth independent coverage of a person to meet GNG or NACTOR. Netherzone (talk) 19:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sara Hauman

Sara Hauman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non-notable reality television contestant. Bgsu98 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, and California. Bgsu98 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete as per nomination. She is notable at the local level, certainly, but not beyond that. TH1980 (talk) 01:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Oregon and Food and drink. matt91486 (talk) 05:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per GNG (disclaimer: stub creator). She is NOT only known for her television appearance. There is plenty of coverage in reputable sources specifically documenting her career in both California and Oregon. I've expanded the stub with sources confirming multiple roles at various restaurants and receipt of Eater Young Gun 2015 award. Not to mention, she is also a 2-time James Beard Rising Star semi-finalist. The article now has 12 citations and there are others to add. Also, nominator didn't even give an assessment of sourcing... Keep and expand! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep: on the basis of improvements and additional citations.--Ipigott (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per WP:HEY. We have stories primarily about her (the first eight footnotes in the current version) in news venues ranging over a 1000-mile span from Portland to San Diego and over a time span from 2016 to now. We also have three somewhat-noteworthy accomplishments (the TV series and two awards), beyond merely working at a restaurant. So I think the pass of WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E is now clear. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maria Cardoso Osório

Maria Cardoso Osório (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alba Cayuelas

Alba Cayuelas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Clàudia Cerdà

Clàudia Cerdà (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jennifer Cerqueira

Jennifer Cerqueira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

María Da Cruz

María Da Cruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. The sources in google news are trivial listings or brief match recaps. Avilich (talk) 17:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alegria (footballer)

Alegria (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ana Costa

Ana Costa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chiquita (footballer)

Chiquita (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dorcacia

Dorcacia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Indira (footballer)

Indira (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ladaínha

Ladaínha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lídia

Lídia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Margarete (footballer)

Margarete (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 17:59, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nandita P. Palshetkar

Nandita P. Palshetkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Promo, saved from Speedy to let the discussion go. Some sources are present in the article, however I doubt Morpho achilles (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Comment I'm uncertain, but I'll say that she seems to be a leader in her field, often quoted in media, having influence in and out of academia.
  1. Egging on. Mother & Baby, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 5, p. 32–34, 2015. Disponível em: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f6h&AN=109268208&site=eds-live&scope=site. Acesso em: 6 ago. 2022. (mentioned seven times)
  2. "International Women's Day- Dr Nandita Palshetkar." BioSpectrum [India], 7 Mar. 2018. Gale General OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A530135780/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=ebsco&xid=cf94b288. Accessed 6 Aug. 2022. (interviewed for international women's day) CT55555 (talk) 11:35, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yana Ross

Yana Ross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

There seems to be a problem with notability, since the article cites no RS (two of the links are her personal webpages, one is a link to a play she directed, and the fourth link is dead). HPfan4 (talk) 16:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Theatre, and Latvia. Shellwood (talk) 16:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment Hard to find links about this theater person, many links to someone with the same name helping Ukrainian refugees. I find this from the NYT [4], helps notability but doesn't fully satisfy it. Not sure how an interview in a peer-reviewed journal fares [5] ? Oaktree b (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete - The only reasonable RS I can find is the mentioned peer-reviewed article and accompanying website/video by the author of article PDXBart (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per WP:BASIC. There is in-depth coverage: Yana Ross: A Director Who Transforms Timeless to Timely (The Theatre Times, 2017 - while this includes an interview, it has substantial additional WP:SECONDARY content to help support notability). In addition to the 2022 NYT review of her work noted above, there is also a 2019 Theatre Times review, and via GScholar: DER KIRSCHGARTEN (THE CHERRY ORCHARD) (Theatre Journal, Vol. 72, Issue 2, June 2020); Performance Reviews: MORBROR VANJA (UNCLE VANYA) (Theatre Journal, Vol. 67, Iss. 3, Oct 2015), as well as secondary context for the 2021 interview in Contemporary Theatre Review, and a variety of citations to inaccesible sources related to her and her work. In the WP library, reviews of her work include "Play About Eastern European Middle Class" (The Warsaw Voice, 2016, "The article reviews the play "The Lake," directed by Yana Ross") and a citation for "Więcej niż węch / More Than Smell" (Didaskalia, (131):48-54, "Pola Sobaś-Mikołajczyk reviews Yana Ross's play Heart of a Dog"); on ProQuest, there is 2022 coverage in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, e.g. "Die Spur des Geldes: Salzburgs Festspiele und die Solway Group", e.g. (Google translated, "Yana Ross told online theater portal Nachtkritik.de that it's "very important that the festival belongs to the artists and not the sponsors, so it's our duty to taxpayers and the public to do the work they commission. Therefore we have no right to stop the work, but we have the right to draw the festival's attention to the mistakes made."") and "Ringelreih mit Knarre"; there is similar 2022 coverage in Welt am Sonntag, e.g. "Toxische Töne", Die Presse, e.g. "Die Klassikszene ist unter Druck" and "Kulturelle Kollateraldellen als Folge des Ukraine-Kriegs", and Die Welt, e.g. "Eine prüde Parade" (translation: "The only thing that caused a scandal in the new version by ten writers was the way the Latvian-born American director Yana Ross and the Swiss author Lukas Bärfuss attracted media attention about the "toxic" festival sponsorship", with additional commentary on the production). Beccaynr (talk) 20:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Toni Baldwin

Toni Baldwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Article unjustifiably created, and evidently/likely by the subject of the article (or a direct affiliate or acquaintance), which constitutes a conflict of interest anyway – Furthermore, this is not a truly notable or significant individual, musician, or public figure. They should not have a Gpedia entry. Nor should this person be listed under North Atlanta High’s notable alumni, 1995 births, Living people, or any of the several other categories and articles to/on which they are linked.

As a musical act, they were never signed under any major (or independent) label or imprint, have never charted on any official record charts (0 results on Billboard for instance), and have no noteworthy (let alone legitimate) social media audience or following. It is suspected that their Verified check marks (Instagram and Facebook) were swindled, primarily due to the existence of this very Gpedia article (and under the guise of public relevance). In addition, no trace whatsoever of their music (or any other significant work) even exists online at this point:

• In previous years, they simply posted their homemade music on their personal SoundCloud and YouTube ― to minimal plays and impressions

• They were never (and still are not) on any major streaming platforms or music services

• All their online content is removed altogether (absolutely no content is on YouTube or SoundCloud or streaming platforms such as Apple Music, Spotify, etc.) plus all their social media profiles (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat) have by now been emptied, hidden, made private, and/or abandoned for an extended time

They seemingly have transitioned all their online profiles from “Musical/recording artist” to the “Social media influencer” type. Therefore, they are indeed using their illegitimate social media Verification and misleading Gpedia entry in hopes of attracting real followers instead of bot or purchased followers.

Finally, the article’s “sources” are not reliable and are all unknown, local, niche, and/or personal webpages directly connected to the subject (who, again, most likely authored this entry or had it authored on their own behalf). Moreover, every “source” is from fall to winter of 2016, with many of the links being dead, having expired domains, or being largely empty/devoid of any content (e.g., the subject’s very own, self-published tonibaldwin.com). UsernamePolicyPassed (talk) 09:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete; The Fame magazine thing is an interview article of the least reliable sort, and nearly everything else is from the subject's own website and facebook pages. Impossible to find anything remotely significant with Google. Elemimele (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Tennessee. Shellwood (talk) 11:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete - Not seeing a single RS about this, 98% of the page is self referencing her website. Cool music but WP:PROMO PDXBart (talk) 19:48, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete never charted at the time, and hasn't seemingly released music in quite a few years from what I see. Wasn't notable then, very likely isn't now. Oaktree b (talk) 23:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    We had another AfD with a foodie person in Atlanta with the same name, she keeps popping up when I try finding stuff for this person. Either one isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And the website is her name in big letters with a sign-up option, nice way to harvest emails, there is no content. If she was notable, I'd at least expect an updated website. Oaktree b (talk) 23:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, clearly not notable, WP:PROMO. —VersaceSpace 🌃 03:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete - It looks like she was a relentless self-promoter for a couple of years, with shenanigans like announcing her own album release in a short YouTube video and then using that video as evidence in self-published webzine articles about how the album was announced. The article is dependent on her own rampant self-promotional social media posts before she apparently got bored and dropped that strategy. I can find no evidence that her releases or overall career were noticed by anyone other than herself. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete Does seem like WP:PROMO, don't see how meets WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. The individual fails WP:NBASIC and WP:NMUSIC and the tone of the article is promotional. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Arunita Kanjilal

Arunita Kanjilal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:SINGER and WP:GNG PravinGanechari (talk) 09:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tamayo Akiyama

Tamayo Akiyama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This person doesn't appear to be notable. Obermallen (talk) 03:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Keep. Seems to pass WP:CREATIVE The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. Although the pass isn't as clear as it first seems as some of her works may have their own articles, but two are poor articles with no citations. Two are however decent. I've not checked the Japanese sources, but assuming good faith. CT55555 (talk) 15:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Redirect to CLAMP. Keep - In searches online and in the WP library, I found one book review (Publishers Weekly, 2006), a mention at p. 98 of her as 'the only ex-CLAMP member to have made an impact on the Western market' in The Rough Guide to Manga (2009), and a 2011 mention in an Anime News Network post, i.e. "Some of the early members, notably Leeza Sei and Tamayo Akiyama, left the group for careers as solo manga-ka, but none have been a fraction as successful as the four women who stuck together." The article includes wikilinks to Mouryou Kiden and Hyper Rune, which have no sources, Secret Chaser, which includes a review (IGN, 2012) identifying her as a former CLAMP member, what appears to be a crowd-sourced review also referencing her former work with CLAMP, a French-language capsule review for Vol. 2 noting her CLAMP background, and an Anime News Network announcement. The other wikilinked publication in the article is Zyword, which does not include the PW review noted above, but in its article has the Amazon page and the book itself as references, and an Anime News Network review of Vol. 1 which describes her as a CLAMP alumni. At this time, there appears to be support for a redirect to CLAMP, but insufficient support for a standalone article per WP:NAUTHOR/WP:CREATIVE or WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. Beccaynr (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC) - comment and !vote updated, per below Beccaynr (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I disagree that the Mania review is crowdsourced and unreliable; as per WP:ANIME/RS#Situational, Mania is considered to be a reliable source for reviews outside of the Maniacs section, which that article was not published in, thus it is a reliable source. When combined with the IGN review, that is two reviews, thus making it meet WP:NBOOK. Zyword also meets NBOOK (at least you don't seem to be denying it does). The other series with articles are old, so they may have coverage in older English or French sources (which I will look through and see what, if anything, I can find. EDIT: Found this review in French and this review in German for Mouryou Kiden, which both seem fairly substantial, thus making it meet NBOOK). But even without those two, I think that between two notable series and some independent articles about her other series, she at least comes close to meeting WP:NAUTHOR 3. Link20XX (talk) 03:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for the WP:ANIME/RS#Situational link - I was trying to assess the site based on its appearance as a crowd-sourced fan site - the WP:ANIME link says, "Editors must be particularly careful the reviews are from AnimeOnDVD/Mania staffers and NOT from the user-submitted "Maniacs" section. When searching for reviews, those that have a URL format of http://www.mania.com/*title*_*somenumbers*.html and that follow the original AoD review format are written by staff reviewers and are considered reliable and usable for articles. "Maniac" reviews written by users which are not RS can be detected by the lack of structured format and a URL in the form of http://www.mania.com/*username*/review/*title*_*somenumbers*.html", and this url does not have a username in the title. I will adjust my comment and !vote. Beccaynr (talk) 04:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per my comment above; having three notable series is enough to meet WP:NAUTHOR 3 in my opinion. While Hyper Rune has an article and was licensed in English and French, I couldn't find any good coverage online and considering how fancrufty it is, I don't think it's worth saving. Link20XX (talk) 04:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Amanda Kimmel

Amanda Kimmel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Competed in non-notable beauty pageants. Bgsu98 (talk) 03:10, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Donna Pokere-Phillips

Donna Pokere-Phillips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:NPOL. Never been elected. Co-leader of very minor party. Possibly redirect. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 17:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete agree with nom, has never won a seat in an election, just seems to go along with the process but never advancing in the polls. Oaktree b (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and New Zealand. Shellwood (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep, due to the significant coverage in the following independent and reliable sources:
  1. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/428174/maori-party-candidate-among-four-arrested-for-trespassing-in-hamilton (significant coverage of her arrest in Radio New Zealand
  2. https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2020/05/covid-19-new-maori-party-candidate-accuses-government-of-ethnic-cleansing.html (significant coverage of her statement on Newshub
  3. I got two hits in the NZ Herald, but behind a firewall, so not certain of significance of coverage
  4. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/kahu/maori-party-candidate-arrested-in-hamilton-land-protest-council-claims-it-was-a-publicity-stunt/UHMHYLZOGLZ7MVIO46O6JCNJR4/ more significant coverage of her arrest
In summary, if we just look at her political career, she's not made it into office or held power. But if we look wider at her general notability, she's notable for her bold statements, being arrested in addition to the politics, so I think that passes WP:GNG CT55555 (talk) 21:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment Those four report refs are the same report, and gets reported regardless as any court reporting paper that has a duty of care to report it. It doesn't indicate notability. Bold statements don't make for notability. The 2nd ref about is a passing mention of the lowest kind. scope_creepTalk 21:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The second one is this. It is titled "CORONAVIRUS COVID-19: New Maori Party candidate accuses Government of 'ethnic cleansing'". The candidate in question is the subject of this article. Her comments are quoted and then there is a 7 minute interview between the journalist and a health official where the journalists asks questions about the issues raised by the subject of the article (i.e. she is having influence). Is that the one that you think is a "passing mention of the lowest kind"?
    I don't understand "Those four report refs are the same report". Do you mean they are talking about the same thing? Because they are not - they cover her arrest about a pipeline and her accusations of ethnical cleansing - two very separate events. CT55555 (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Incorrect. Her arrest (October 2020) and her "ethnic cleansing" comments (May 2020) are completely different stories/reports. Arrests are not routinely reported, so you can't choose to ignore or discount that story. Reports are the yardstick by which WP:GNG operates. To put it another way: if a person has done something that triggers a paper's "a duty of care", there's a good chance that we're talking about something notable. Elguaponz (talk) 21:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - significant coverag ein multiple, independent sources; passes GNG--IdiotSavant (talk) 23:51, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep (ec) She's been given enough media coverage that GNG has been met. There are currently five independent secondary sources with that article that aren't just media releases or passing mentions: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. There might well be more out there. With regards to CT55555 not getting to NZH content, I've particularly looked on their site only and here's some articles with substance: 2017 video interview as one of five candidates and her representing Brian Te Huia in a legal capacity (plus an article on her 2020 arrest but that topic is already covered by the RNZ source). Overall, there's enough there that confirms notability. I should add that in the unlikely event that this article is not kept, it should be draftified back to its original position rather than deleted. Schwede66 23:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Doesn't meet WP:NPOL, but does meet WP:GNG due to the combination of sources given above. -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep, meets the GNG threshold clearly. —VersaceSpace 🌃 03:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Fully agreed with CT55555, passes WP:GNG. BBSTOP (talk) 05:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Patricia Nichols

Patricia Nichols (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NBIO. Poorly sourced BLP, not finding significant coverage in additional sources that would ascertain notability, not sure if the listed publications satisfy the criteria stated at NACADEMIC. Complex/Rational 16:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete. I see no claim of notability here. Also a very poor article, mostly uncited, that looks like a CV and contains information I would not expect in a WP:BLP such as children's names. CT55555 (talk) 18:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @CT55555: I already did a copyvio check; nothing was flagged. Complex/Rational 21:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I wasn't suggesting there was any copyright issues. CT55555 (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Apologies, I misinterpreted your comment; I assumed CV meant copyvio (since that's where WP:CV points). Complex/Rational 21:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Ha ha. I wondered why you thought that. I had no idea. Sorry. The risks of using acronyms. I meant it looks like a Curriculum vitae. CT55555 (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    The more appropriate WP:LINK in this case is WP:NOTCV. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete. The badly-sourced material can be trimmed but I don't see the citations needed for WP:PROF#C1, or any other form of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete don't see how it meets WP:NPROF. I'd originally tagged this as like a resume back in April. -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete, I looked at some old newspaper coverage for her and while I see some instances of her giving professional opinions or being quoted as saying something, I could not see any article or instance of WP:SIGCOV that would lead me to believe notability can be asserted. Also agree with above that the article state resembles a Curriculum vitae. Bungle (talkcontribs) 08:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heather McGowan

Heather McGowan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library) It's doesn't show any significant coverage to encyclopedia. I can't find independent reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mokorow1122 (talkcontribs) 13:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oaktree b (talk) 18:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With the NYT and New Yorker discussions/reviews above, she's more than notable. Oaktree b (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep per WP:NAUTHOR. Reviews of her books include Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, The New York Times, and the WP Library notes a 2001 interview with secondary context/commentary in The London Evening Standard ("Boarding school was never so much fun; Heather McGowan (right) has been compared to Joseph Heller and Dave Eggars, but her powerful debut novel, Schooling, is more akin to James Joyce. She talks to Zoe Williams.") (full text available on ProQuest), and a 2001 review in The Observer, a 2001 review in the Los Angeles Times (full text available on ProQuest), a 2001 review in The Times (via Gale), a 2001 review in Harper's Bazaar (via Gale), and a 2006 review in Booklist. ProQuest includes an abstract for a 2001 Providence Journal article about her, "Heather McGowan, Where are you?", a 2001 review in Newsday, a Jul/Aug 2010 article titled "Recent Winners" from Poets and Writers reporting "Poet Jay Hopler of Salt Lake City and fiction writer Heather McGowan of New York City each received a Rome Fellowship in Literature and will spend a year in residence at the American Academy in Rome", and a 2001 profile article about her, "Writers on the verge: Heather McGowan" in the Village Voice. Beccaynr (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Clear pass of WP:NAUTHOR. -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Easily passes WP:NAUTHOR due to numerous reviews listed above. Samsmachado (talk) 16:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Snow keep: clearly notable. —VersaceSpace 🌃 03:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cristina Milani

Cristina Milani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Gpedia is not a resume or CV. No reliable sources available to establish WP:GNG. PlayOboe (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Prim Lyza

Prim Lyza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

This person is not notable, according to a thorough online search. There are no publications to support her claims of work. Fails general notability guidelines. PlayOboe (talk) 12:44, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. PlayOboe (talk) 12:44, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Cambodia, and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Delete Two sources in Cambodian script, don't appear notable using GTranslate. Simply talking about something related. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep based on a search for Khmer language sources aided by machine translation. Issues with the article can be partly attributed to its origins as a puff piece. Another contributing factor is wp:systemic bias due to a lack of English language sources and shortage of proficient editors from Cambodia. I've taken some initial steps to try to address sourcing and tone issues. Notability assessment follows.
Difficult to assess as an actress, probably does not meet WP:ENT. Filmography looks incomplete and lacks details, but appears to be a product of good faith efforts; finding reliable secondary sources is challenging. Primary-sourced evidence of acting career in the form of a "portfolio" of excerpts on her YT channel, appears to be mostly TV rather than movies; unclear if in major or minor roles. Recipient in 2013 of "most popular actress" category in Cambodian entertainment awards show, but some controversy over this as it was decided by popular vote. Interestingly, a recent news article chose to cite her appearance in an MV rather than some more substantial acting achievement. Youtube search finds evidence of non-acting appearances (talk/variety shows) on television (MyTV, PNN) supporting some amount of celebrity status. As a fashion model, there are primary-source claims via interview/spokesperson that she has attended shows in multiple foreign countries; was able to substantiate Vietnam Int'l Fashion Week 2016. "The Secret of the Night" award also appears to be fashion-related (YT) but does not seem remarkable. With respect to invited to participate in events and invited to opening ceremonies of retail outlets it is unclear whether attending as a guest or for modeling work, may be a mix of both. Clearly not of supermodel-tier notability.
Having failed to find enough evidence to support notability based on specific critieria, we look to WP:GNG. Has coverage spanning a decade across multiple news outlets. Gets attention for dressing extravagantly and flaunting her figure, so need to filter out sources (e.g. sabay, khmerload) where coverage is basically a thinly veiled excuse for photo galleries. There is SIGCOV in articles written specifically about her in entertainment sections of newspapers, though much of it is celebrity gossip that I think we'd rather not include in the article:
  • Generic celebrity/socialite coverage. [7] Wears expensive clothes, [8] or is she just exaggerating the price? [9]
  • Scandal involving an affair with a married man who had abandoned his family [10][11]
  • Charity work [12][13][14]
  • Criticism from conservatives about immodesty, materialism, abandoning traditional values etc [15][16]
  • Not active in local acting scene [17][18]
  • Revelation that she is a single mother [19]
These come from Khmer language edition of The Phnom Penh Post (oldest English newspaper), as well as Koh Santepheap Daily (widest circulation) and Kampuchea Thmey Daily. The subject has sufficient celebrity status in Cambodia to warrant sustained coverage; although this could well be a case of famous for being famous (or scandalous) since her acting output isn't treated by sources as of particular note — found no in-depth discussion of any acting role she has taken. — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Getting attention for "dressing extravagantly and flaunting her figure" is not a notability criteria on Gpedia. On that logic, we've to include all Instagram stars on Gpedia. PlayOboe (talk) 17:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not all Instagram stars receive sustained significant coverage in reliable sources. That is the notability criteria being cited here. Stop trying to twist my words. — 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominated by a confirmed blocked sockpuppet with no remaining delete proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zibby Owens

Zibby Owens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Run-of-the-mill! Fails WP:GNG. She is a skilled but not particularly well-known podcaster, according to my thorough investigation. PlayOboe (talk) 04:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep - I did some investigation too about things missing from the article. 1) Zibby Owens: The New York woman upending the publishing scene on The Jerusalem Post on 8th July 2022. 2) Author on Good Morning America [20] 3) interview about her new book on Good Morning America 4) "Owens has staged an awards show to honor the best books, and even started her own publishing company, Zibby Books." at ABC7NY 5) Owens interview on Forbes, 6) Owens' book on Penguin Random House 7) Owens on CNN 8) Owens on Business Insider 9) Owens on Psychology Today 10) Owens on Publishers Weekly. So I think she deserves an article for the amount of notable media featuring her. Jjanhone (talk) 07:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

:::Comment Here is my evaluation of the sources you provided: 1) Zibby Owens: The New York woman upending the publishing scene :Running a publishing company and promoting reading don't automatically make someone notable. 2) [21] : An article recommending books on a programme or website. 3) Forbes : Same as Good Morning America article. 4) Other articles are promotional and don't indicate her notability. I don't think those articles are suffice to prove her notability. Good day!PlayOboe (talk) 09:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

:::Comment: Examined those articles carefully. It says a lot to be a billionaire's daughter. PlayOboe (talk) 17:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Matilda Kerry

Matilda Kerry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Fails WP:GNG. She did what the majority of doctors do worldwide: she worked with the poor. PlayOboe (talk) 04:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 00:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Solmaz Naghiloo

Solmaz Naghiloo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

No claim of notability is made here, subject does not qualify under any existing SSG. A Google search turns up only 8 hits, among which is this same Gpedia article along with some Facebook results. No significant discussion was found, at least not in English. If other language sources exist, they need to be shown. A loose necktie (talk) 07:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete same case as all those non-notable shooters here Gpedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Hossein Sharifzadeh. Sports2021 (talk) 16:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete junior medals are not important in this sport.--Miha2020 (talk) 10:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Marta Aura

Marta Aura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Not fulfilling WP:ACTOR or WP:ANYBIO guidilines Morpho achilles (talk) 07:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The person was notable enough, with over 100 credits.
The quality of the article though asks for basically a complete rewriting. Pazguillermo (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Marta Aura was a notable actress. She had worked in a number of films. Passes WP:GNG. Article needs more citations. Nupamjo (talk) 07:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Plus nominator is a sockpuppet of User:No Great Shaker. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cheraldine Oudolf

Cheraldine Oudolf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources as required by WP:SIGCOV. The sole source is a statistical database only. Sistorian (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would be happy to change my comment if you can provide sources. I suggested delete because after searching for sources I find 2 google hits. I did my own name and got 900,000. WCMemail 12:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I too had no luck on Google. I do not see what is bizarre, or even wrong, about nominating an article that so completely fails the significant coverage requirement. In my opinion, we must place emphasis on quality over quantity. I doubt if you will find Cheraldine in Britannica, for example. Articles about cricketers are fine if there is significant coverage because the player is well known or has accomplished an outstanding achievement, but to try and fill mainspace with articles like this is a waste of mainspace. The little we know about Cheraldine could be included in a list of Dutch players and that would be sufficient.
Sistorian (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Netherlands women ODI cricketers Must say I'm surprised at the lack of coverage in a simple search, so at redirect for now. If something is found please let me know and I'll reconsider. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep - Sending international sportspeople to AfD without goes to show what we have become as a project. This player participated in two World Cups and has 36 WODI appearances. "I can't find any sources myself so I'll send to AfD" is not the way these things should be handled - the cricket Wikiproject is very good at finding secondary sources when necessary and prompted to do so. Of course more work needs to be put into research about women's cricket in general - but this is the nature of the sport. Bobo. 00:29, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, Bobo. Thank you for your comments here and at the Meston case. I have been reading WP:ATD on the deletion policy page and I am beginning to think a different approach is needed. I still need to do a lot of research to get my head around the site's policies, guidelines and advice essays but I do have an idea.
Take a case like Cheraldine where the article is three short sentences of basic information lifted from a single statistical database site. As it is currently written, the article definitely fails WP:SIGCOV. As I said above, I cannot find anything else about Cheraldine online. She is an experienced international player, though, so there must be information in book, magazine and newspaper sources. Those, I fully accept, will be difficult and time-consuming to find.
Suppose I tag the article with the notability template banner and then add it to a list of cricket articles needing attention? I leave it alone for six months and then, if it is still three short statistical sentences, I do a straight redirect to List of Netherlands women ODI cricketers as suggested by Rugbyfan22? No need to involve AFD at all and, as you have requested, the cricket project sees the issue by monitoring the list and has six months to respond.
I became interested in AFD after reading the Lugnuts/Lambert cases at the Arbitration Committee. From that, I know there is going to be a reaction to the stubs created by Lugnuts although there are concerns about AFD being deluged. I would like to help with the initiative because I believe in quality over quantity and I have submitted six cases to AFD in the last few days to gain some experience of the process.
That is where I am coming from. I do not think short "stubs" like the Cheraldine article benefit the site's reputation; instead, they are an actual constraint. A reader wants useful information, more than so-and-so is a Dutch cricketer born when and where who has played in ODI matches for her country. Articles like that convince the readers that Gpedia is a waste of space and they go away.
I do not know if my idea is practical because it might be out of process in some way. I need to fully understand what is in process. I will be happy to discuss further, of course. Thank you for your suggestions which most certainly provided me with food for thought. Best wishes.
Sistorian (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I can't say much more than that what happens at AfD is much more than just a single situation, and for one reason or another, it has been causing issues within the cricket section for many years. Some situations resolve and some don't. Comme ci comme ca. There are more editors out there than just Lugnuts and JPL. There is still so much scope for article creation within our project, and, should you feel the need to help out, or can add more information, our project is always needing more fresh contributors. Unfortunately this and the Meston case do not work together as a single argument - international women's and domestic men's cricket are two much different animals. As I say, much more needs to be done in the world of women's international cricket, but that does not make it an invalid subject for contribution. Bobo. 08:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Darinka Jandrić

Darinka Jandrić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Per Gpedia:BLP1E and/or WP:NOPAGE. She was not even supercentenarian (person who is/was aged 110+). In fact, she was only 108 years and one month old. Also, the author of this article seems to have determined that she is a or "was the oldest known living person in Serbia" recognized by an organization called ESO, but I don't think ESO is an internationally recognized and prestigious longevity science organization, unlike Gerontology Research Group. More famous and prominent articles about the oldest people, the country's oldest person titieholder, have also been deleted in the past like Gpedia:Articles for deletion/Misao Okawa (2nd nomination), Gpedia:Articles for deletion/Yukichi Chuganji (4th nomination), Gpedia:Articles for deletion/Mamie Eva Keith (2nd nomination), etc. There is no reason to keep only this article of the oldest person in a small country like Serbia, when considering impartiality...--Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 09:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions 09:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Serbia. Shellwood (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment Per WP:BLP1E, "WP:BLP1E should be applied only to biographies of living people". This person is not living, so that rationale is not relevant here. Jacona (talk) 13:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Alright. But I guess this article still not reach WP:GNG.--Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 01:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • She is known for several other things. THE POINT OF THE ARTICLE IS NOT THAT SHE WAS THE OLDEST. She was a student of World War II, a division medic, a member of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia, and above all a woman whose entire family was killed by the Ustashas. .she is not a Supercentenarian, ESO does not deal with people under 110 years of age. (Only 110+ same as GRG). She might have been the oldest in her country. But that is not important, it is important to rearrange the article.Дејан2021 (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Keep Unlike some other unverified supercentenarian articles you nominated, this person is also notable for being a World War II veteran. It could be improved and potentially expanded, of course. The List of last surviving World War II veterans does not contain any Yugoslav WWII veterans for some reason, that could be filled out. By the way, the argument "small country like Serbia" is not a great outlook, she lived most of her life in Yugoslavia, a pretty significant country back in the day. I don't think being from a "small country" is a great argument for deleting biographies anyway. Per Дејан2021 as well. -Vipz (talk) 03:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • It is partially fixed for now, although there may be more improvements. She was not a Supercentenarian (110+), as I said, down to the other side of her significance, other than longevity. She spent most of her life in Yugoslavia, more precisely in Belgrade, present-day Serbia. She was one of the last women veterans of the second world war, she is not the last, there are many people (95+) who are still alive, who were participants in the war II...Дејан2021 (talk) 13:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]