Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Requested move 21 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 09:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

– It seems like it might well be better to list this explicitly as the deletion sorting page for the particular football code that is being referenced. There are many codes of Football that should not wind up here and I believe that this move would reduce the number of erroneous listings that wind up at this location. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 02:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Oppose as the relevant WikiProject is WP:FOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Oppose. For most of the world, football without a qualifier means association football. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Oppose the relevant project is WP:FOOTBALL and for most of the world Football means association football.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposal: 'Good and Featured Content'

There are a number of discussions going on right now after an FA was merged, then delisted with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis (baseball) (2nd nomination) preceeding and making a fait accompli Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lewis (baseball)/archive1. I propose that a new DELSORT list be added to which GA/FA/FL/etc. content up for deletion can be added, and those with a particular interest in such topics can review and participate. Thoughts? Jclemens (talk) 18:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

(Came here from WT:ATA.) An FA/GA DELSORT would be useful; I'd probably follow it. Given the extra effort that went into those, it makes sense to have a specific delsort for them. If for no other reason I'd be curious to see how often it happens that a GA/FA is nominated. (Maybe JPxG's Oracle already knows?) Levivich 13:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

As luck would have it, my software does store article assessments (although not for articles that are deleted). Incorporating it into the Oracle's list pages would require a bit of work, but would be possible. jp×g 14:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

So there's a possibility that this could be automated in some fashion, rather than just manually added by editors, like most other DELSORTs seem to be? Jclemens (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Well, either that, or have DELSORTS added automatically (since GA/FA are very easily machine-readable from an article and leave no room for ambiguity). I'd be fine with submitting a BRFA for it if there's any interest. jp×g 02:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

AfD Science and Technology Page Issues

What's going on on Category:AfD debates (Science and technology)? There's a user page, a few log pages, and a few category pages that seem to have been incorrectly transcluded. PianoDan (talk) 23:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

How to add a CfD link to this page?

I've tried (and failed) to add in a link in the /Women page, to this Category for Deletion discussion


Can anyone help me out?

Thanks Gilgamesh4 (talk) 15:10, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Mohan Shrivastava up for deletion

Indian polititican. Question of notability. Inherent language problems. 7&6=thirteen () 13:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

<div style="font-size: x-small;">The article is a derivative under the <a href="">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License</a>. A link to the original article can be found <a href="">here</a> and attribution parties <a href=";action=history">here</a>. By using this site, you agree to the <a href="">Terms of Use</a>. Gpedia Ⓡ is a registered trademark of the Cyberajah Pty Ltd.</div>